Why Independent Museums and Emerging Technologies Are a Must to Preserve History, and Safeguard Truth

GCSET
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

History doesn't occur by chance. It takes custodians: institutions rooted sufficiently in place to be able to sense the subtleties of experience, yet limber enough to bend to new information and technology. Standalone museums such as the National Susan B. Anthony Museum & House perform that function.

Museums are not warehouses full of artifacts," President & CEO of the Museum & House Deborah L. Hughes said. "They are working laboratories for democracy. They let us test our hypotheses, engage with our past, and envision what comes next." In a world where misinformation spreads quicker than fact and argumentative disputes fill the headlines on a daily basis, that role is not only beneficial but vital.

The Susan B. Anthony Museum stands because of one very special reason: to search out and discuss the life of a woman who was relentless in the pursuit of equality. Anthony was not afraid to seek human rights. To Hughes, that is more important than ever today. "Susan B. Anthony's example becomes more important during hard times," she says. "She lived through division and upheaval. She understood that change comes by stick-to-itiveness, even when the world isn't certain."

It's not always easy to unearth that legacy to place things in glass cases. It requires doing, especially from historians who are willing to return and retell ancient stories in new terms. The Museum's archives, much of it asleep for decades, contain in handwritten letters, publications, and personal ephemera secrets waiting to be uncovered. "Digitization is opening doors we never could have dreamed about five years ago," Hughes says. "But access is not enough. We need scholars who are willing to reapproach these sources anew, and to make way for several voices to make sense of what they find."

The Anthony Museum maintains its stories in a special state of agility. Free from the bureaucracy that so frequently entangles museums, they are able to quickly respond to new discoveries and engage visitors in real-time conversation. This autumn, the Museum will open a new building specifically to do just that, one constructed not just to look at history, but to talk to it.

"When a scholar discovers something new in our collections, that find doesn't remain on paper," Hughes says. "It becomes part of the dialogue. It enters public awareness. A high school student passing through on a field trip may be the first person to connect with that material. That instant of connection, between then and now, is where transformation starts."

Museums teach citizens, not slogans, but context. The Susan B. Anthony Museum is now a polling station, close to where she herself voted against unjust law. "People come in and say, 'I voted here,' " Hughes reports. "That simple statement is more effective than any textbook. It reminds us that democracy is a habit, not a promise."

Technology has democratized access to history in a certain sense, but it also facilitated manipulation. That is why learning institutions founded on truth and questioning are unacceptable. "There is a difference between reading about Susan B. Anthony and standing on the floorboards where she planned her next campaigns," Hughes says. "Presence matters. Evidence matters. Truth matters."

Anthony Museum is not a passive museum; they are an force for accountability