A controversial ruling by the Kerala High Court has sparked nationwide debate after it quashed a case against a teacher accused of corporal punishment. The court's decision, which referenced the ancient Indian epic Mahabharata and the story of Ekalavya, has raised concerns about the ethics of physical discipline in schools.
Justice PV Kunhikrishnan, in his ruling, dismissed the case against the teacher, citing the example of Ekalavya, a figure from the Mahabharata, who allegedly cut off his thumb as guru dakshina (a traditional offering) to his teacher, Dronacharya. According to the judge, this act symbolized the importance of discipline and respect for authority, drawing a parallel to today's teacher-student relationship. As per reports of Times of India, the ruling has ignited outrage from child rights activists, educators, and legal experts, with many condemning it as “regressive” and “unacceptable.”
While Section 89 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) allows for exceptions in cases of physical punishment if done in good faith, the Right to Education Act strictly prohibits physical punishment and mental harassment in schools. This contradiction has raised questions regarding the application of laws meant to protect students.
This ruling has reignited the longstanding debate on corporal punishment in Indian schools. Experts argue that physical punishment can lead to long-term psychological damage in children.
The Supreme Court may step in to review the ruling, providing much-needed clarity on the issue. In the meantime, educators, policymakers, and child rights activists are urged to collaborate in ensuring the safety and mental well-being of students.
