Teachers And Students Unhappy With Delhi University's New VAC Class Guidelines

News
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Delhi University's recent directive advising colleges to avoid scheduling consecutive Value Addition Courses (VAC) classes has sparked controversy among teachers and students. The university cited concerns that consecutive courses would be "detrimental to the learning experience of students."

However, teachers have criticized the move, arguing it will create chaos with already finalized timetables. Pankaj Garg, chairman of the Indian National Teachers' Congress (INTEC), expressed concerns about the potential disruption this directive might cause. "Reworking the timetables at this stage is impractical and will negatively impact both teachers and students," Garg said.

VAC courses enhance students' skills, knowledge, and employability beyond their regular curriculum. They cover various subjects, from language skills to technical training. The university's directive advised colleges not to include two consecutive theory or practical classes in the VAC schedule and to limit VAC class time to no more than two hours.

Teachers and student organizations have questioned the relevance and effectiveness of VAC courses. Students have also voiced their dissatisfaction. The controversy underscores the ongoing debates about the university's curriculum and teaching methods. Critics argue that while the intention behind VAC courses is good, their execution needs significant improvement. 

The administration's decision to implement this directive has also raised broader questions about the university's approach to education. Many believe that more comprehensive reforms are needed to address the systemic issues affecting the quality of education at Delhi University.

According to India Today reports, the debate continues; it remains to be seen how the university will navigate these challenges and whether it will take additional steps to address the concerns raised by teachers and students. The situation highlights the need for a more collaborative approach to educational policy-making that considers the realities of teaching and learning environments.