Delhi High Court orders revision of CLAT 2025 results due to Answer Key Errors

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to revise the results of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025, following the discovery of errors in the official answer key.

The court's intervention came in response to a petition filed by CLAT candidate Aditya Singh, who raised concerns over the accuracy of the answer key. Upon review, the court found that errors were present in questions 14 and 100, which led to the decision to revise the results.

In light of this ruling, the release of the CLAT 2025 first allotment list, initially set for December 26, 2024, has been delayed. The Consortium of NLUs, responsible for conducting the exam, has assured candidates that they are committed to upholding transparency and fairness throughout the process.

The revision of the CLAT 2025 results is expected to benefit candidates whose scores were negatively impacted by the errors in the answer key. The court's decision has been met with approval by both candidates and legal experts, who have long advocated for increased accuracy and transparency in the examination process.

The revision of results also underscores the importance of accuracy in entrance examinations that determine admission to prestigious law schools across the country. Candidates who had expressed concerns over the fairness of the exam now feel assured that their grievances have been addressed.

The Consortium of NLUs has yet to announce a new date for the release of the first allotment list, but candidates are hopeful that the revision of results will lead to a more equitable outcome. This move by the Delhi High Court serves as a reminder of the critical role of fairness and transparency in academic admissions, especially for highly competitive exams like the CLAT.

Candidates and experts alike are now calling for more rigorous checks and improvements in the exam process to prevent such issues in the future. The court's decision to mandate the revision of results has restored confidence in the examination process, signaling a step toward greater accountability and fairness in law school admissions.