Top News

Hundreds of students staged a protest outside Khan Sir's coaching institute, Khan Global Studies, in Patna on Wednesday, June 3, against an attack that occurred on Tuesday night.

The protest resulted in a lot of traffic congestion around Musallahpur Haat, with students blocking the roads and shouting slogans for justice. The traffic was stopped in both directions, and a large crowd gathered outside the coaching centre.

The protest comes a day after a group of 15 to 20 people allegedly attacked and vandalised Khan Global Studies on Tuesday night. The group reportedly hurled stones at the institute, broke property, ripped banners celebrating the Bihar Police exam results and injured a security guard.

Students Demand Strict Action

Angry students converged in large numbers Wednesday morning, calling for action to be taken against those responsible for the attack. Students had protested outside the institute and police personnel deployed to maintain law and order, several videos showed. The incident was soon a big topic of discussion on social media, where many students voiced their support for Khan Sir and his coaching institute.

What did the police say?

Khan Sir first stated that the attack was connected to the rivalry in the coaching industry and that people from a rival coaching institute were behind the attack. But police said the investigation is ongoing. Stone-throwing and scuffling were confirmed by officials looking at CCTV footage. But police said there is no evidence of gunshots yet.

3 men arrested

Police have arrested three people in connection with the attack, including a person linked to a rival coaching institute. CCTV footage and evidence is still being analysed to find out who else may be involved. The area is under heavy police guard to ensure that there is no further disturbance.

Students, please listen to Khan Sir and follow his instructions.

Khan Sir then came out on the balcony of the coaching institute and requested the students to keep a cool head. He folded his hands and instructed students to go home and not engage in any confrontation. He also thanked the police and administration for taking action and providing security.

Khan Sir informed that the classes will not be held today and asked students to not take law into their own hands. He said that the poor children deserve good education and he called for peace.

Why is this incident important?

The incident has garnered attention due to Khan Sir's popularity among students taking government job exams. Well known for low cost coaching, 

Khan Sir has garnered a vast following of students across India, both in the classroom and on his online educational platform.

The attack and the student protest have raised issues of student safety, coaching institute rivalry and the need for improved protection of educational institutions. Investigations are continuing by police and more information will be available in the next few days.

The Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA) has showcased its technology-driven examination security framework through a new video, highlighting the measures being adopted to ensure transparency, fairness, and accuracy in the Karnataka Common Entrance Test (KCET) process. The move comes at a time when concerns over examination security have intensified nationwide following the controversy surrounding the NEET UG 2026 examination and the reported paper leak incident.

In the six-minute video released on its official YouTube platform, KEA explained how advanced digital tools are being used to strengthen various stages of the examination process. These include digital monitoring of examination centres, secure encryption systems to protect question papers and candidate data, and automated evaluation mechanisms designed to minimise human errors. According to the authority, these initiatives are intended to enhance trust among students while ensuring a more reliable assessment system.

KEA stated that the technology-enabled framework also improves transparency by allowing students to access clear information regarding examinations, results, and seat allocation procedures. The authority believes that such measures can significantly reduce malpractice, accelerate result processing, and improve the overall admission process.

Meanwhile, students continue to await the KCET 2026 results. The declaration of results was delayed after agricultural and veterinary practical examinations had to be rescheduled and conducted again at the Hiriyur examination centre on June 1. More than 24,000 candidates were affected by the rescheduling, and KEA decided to postpone the result announcement until the practical examination marks could be incorporated into the final merit list.

Over 3.11 lakh candidates appeared for KCET 2026, which was conducted in pen-and-paper mode from April 22 to April 24 across Karnataka. With the practical examinations now completed, the results are expected to be announced shortly on the official portals. The counselling process for admissions to engineering, agriculture, pharmacy, and other professional courses is likely to begin soon after the results are declared.

The latest steps taken by KEA are being viewed as an effort to reassure students and parents about the integrity of the examination process at a time when exam security has become a major national concern.

Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke has said he will come back to India on 6 June and organise a protest demanding resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan for not holding any accountability for controversies over major national exams.

Dipke issued a video statement on social media, urging students and citizens to join in a "peaceful, constitutional movement.

It is time for all of us to unite and follow the path of the Constitution of India and peacefully raise our voice for the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan. If we raise our voices together, they will definitely have to listen to us," Dipke said.

A protest was planned in Delhi on June 6

Dipke says he will reach Delhi on the morning of 6 June and has asked his supporters to meet him at the airport. The group would then go to Parliament Street Police Station to request official permission for a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar, one of the protest zones in the capital, he said.

The announcement follows the ongoing debate in the public discourse on examination management, student welfare and accountability in the Indian education system.

Exam Controversies at the Centre of the Protest 

Dipke claimed that the future of over 1 crore students sitting for exams like NEET, CUET, CBSE and SSC GD had been impacted by multiple controversies and administrative lapses.

He claimed there had been "zero accountability" despite concerns raised by students and parents over examination-related issues. He also claimed that students faced serious consequences as a result of stress and uncertainty about the examination system.

The allegations come from a growing discontent among parts of students who have been calling for more transparency, accountability and reforms in the conduct of high-stakes exams.

About Cockroach Janta Party 

The Cockroach Janta Party is a satirical online movement that was gaining momentum among young social media users earlier this year.

The movement was founded by Dipke, who lives in Boston, United States, and addresses topics like unemployment, institutional accountability, education policies, and freedom of expression through political satire, memes and social commentary.

The group quickly made a splash online, with many followers on social media platforms and it was one of the most discussed digital movements in the country among young Indians.

Origin Linked to Supreme Court Proceedings

The movement began with a Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant in the Supreme Court proceedings held on 15 May, when they raised issues about the unemployment of the youth, social media activism and the use of RTI mechanisms.

During the hearing, the phrase "youngsters like cockroaches" became a topic of discussion online. The Chief Justice later clarified that the comment was made about people who are allegedly using fake degrees and forged qualifications and not about the general unemployed youth. The term later inspired the name "Cockroach Janta Party" and it went viral online.

Court Hearing on Satire and Free Speech

The movement has also sparked a wider legal debate about satire, social media content and free speech. In recent court proceedings, Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal, acting for Dipke, contended that the Cockroach Janta Party account was a satirical one and requested for the temporary restoration of the account while the legal proceedings are ongoing.

The court pointed out that laws on online content moderation and platform regulation are still developing and suggested that issues raised by the blocking order could be considered in subsequent hearings.

In the meantime, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, said the government would put its case before any final decision is made.

Student issues remain a topic of public debate

Dipke's intended demonstration reflects the increasing prominence of student issues in public debate, including issues of transparency in examinations, educational reform and institutional accountability.

The planned protest is yet to see how much participation it will get but the announcement has already sparked discussion on social media platforms, with debates on student welfare, competitive examinations and education policy growing in momentum.

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has informed the Supreme Court of India that the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET UG) will be conducted in computer-based test (CBT) mode from 2027, marking a major shift in the country's largest medical entrance examination.

The announcement was made through an affidavit submitted before a bench comprising Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, which is hearing a batch of petitions related to the alleged NEET UG 2026 paper leak that led to the cancellation of the May 3 examination.

According to the affidavit, the transition to CBT mode follows recommendations made by a High-Level Committee of Experts (HLCE) constituted by the Ministry of Education in June 2024 under the chairmanship of K Radhakrishnan. The committee was tasked with proposing reforms to strengthen the integrity and transparency of national entrance examinations.

The NTA stated that NEET UG remains the only major examination conducted in pen-and-paper mode, while other large-scale entrance tests administered by the agency have already transitioned to digital platforms. The expert panel recommended moving NEET UG to CBT mode and introducing multi-stage and multi-session testing to enhance security and operational efficiency.

The agency informed the court that the Ministry of Education established a High-Powered Steering Committee (HPSC) in November 2024 to oversee the implementation of the HLCE's 101 recommendations. The committee has been responsible for ensuring structured, time-bound reforms across the national examination system.

Meanwhile, the re-examination scheduled for June 21, 2026, will be conducted under a strengthened standard operating framework featuring multi-layer authentication, enhanced surveillance systems and coordination among multiple agencies. The NTA said these measures are intended to safeguard examination integrity and restore confidence among candidates.

More than 22 lakh students appeared for NEET UG 2026 across 5,432 examination centres. The agency emphasized that the cancellation of the original examination and referral of the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) demonstrate the government's commitment to maintaining trust and fairness in India's national examination system.

The transition to CBT mode is expected to be one of the most significant reforms in the history of the medical entrance examination, affecting millions of aspiring doctors in the years ahead.

Congress MP Rahul Gandhi has intensified his criticism of the government and the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) over allegations surrounding the board's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system, claiming that answer sheets may have been scanned using mobile phones instead of professional scanning equipment.

The allegations are linked to CBSE's large-scale digital evaluation initiative for Class 12 examinations and have reignited debate over the board's tender process, data security measures and evaluation standards.

In a post on X, Gandhi cited concerns raised by student researcher Sarthak Sidhant, whose document-based investigation has drawn attention to alleged changes in the tender conditions related to the digitisation of answer books.

Rahul Gandhi Questions Changes in CBSE Tender Conditions

According to Gandhi, CBSE's initial tender issued in May 2025 reportedly required answer sheets to be scanned using automated robotic scanners, with preserved spines and a minimum scanning resolution of 300 DPI. However, he alleged that a revised tender issued later removed or diluted some of these technical requirements.

"CBSE's May 2025 tender required answer sheets to be scanned with automatic robotic scanners, spines preserved, at a minimum of 300 DPI. The tender re-issued in August quietly removed all of it," Gandhi wrote on X.

He further alleged that answer sheets were scanned using mobile phones after the revised conditions came into effect, claiming that issues such as blurred images, missing pages and incomplete scans may have resulted from the altered process.

Student Researcher Raises Concerns Over Scanned Answer Sheets

The controversy gained momentum after social media discussions involving Class 12 student researcher Sarthak Sidhant and ethical hacker Nisarga Adhikary, who have both raised questions regarding the implementation of the OSM system.

Adhikary claimed that vulnerabilities in the online marking portal could potentially allow access to scanned answer booklets. Screenshots of answer sheets circulated online subsequently became a subject of scrutiny.

While examining some of the images, Sarthak pointed to visible drop shadows and fold marks appearing on certain scanned answer sheets. He questioned whether such characteristics would normally appear if professional document scanners had been used.

In a post on X, he asked whether the observed shadows and folds indicated that answer sheets may have been digitised using alternative methods rather than dedicated scanning equipment.

Questions Over Vendor Selection and Procurement Process

At the centre of the controversy are allegations related to the procurement process and the selection of the vendor responsible for digitising answer books.

Critics have alleged that technical eligibility criteria and security requirements were modified between the original and revised tenders. Some have questioned whether these changes influenced the awarding of the contract to private vendor COEMPT Edu Teck, which was tasked with digitising answer sheets for the OSM system.

Opposition leaders and student groups have argued that the procurement process should be examined to ensure transparency and accountability.

CBSE Digital Evaluation System Faces Scrutiny

The On-Screen Marking system was introduced as part of CBSE's efforts to modernise the evaluation process and improve efficiency through digital assessment.

However, recent allegations have led to broader discussions about data security, scanning quality, evaluation accuracy and the safeguards required when handling examination records affecting millions of students.

The controversy has also attracted attention from cybersecurity researchers, education activists and student communities who are seeking greater clarity regarding the implementation of the digital evaluation platform.

Allegations Yet to Be Independently Verified

The claims regarding mobile phone scanning, tender modifications and security vulnerabilities have been widely circulated on social media and amplified by opposition leaders. However, the allegations remain contested, and no official findings have yet been released publicly to conclusively establish the claims.

The developments have nevertheless intensified scrutiny of CBSE's digital evaluation process, with students, parents and education stakeholders closely watching for further responses from the board and concerned authorities.

Medical students across India may soon receive greater flexibility in completing their undergraduate training, as the National Medical Commission (NMC) has proposed extending the maximum duration for finishing the MBBS programme from nine years to ten years.

The proposal has been outlined in a draft amendment to the Graduate Medical Education Regulations (GMER), 2023. Under the revised provision, students will be allowed to remain enrolled in the MBBS programme for up to ten years from the date of admission, including the mandatory Compulsory Rotatory Medical Internship (CRMI). At present, students must complete the entire course within nine years.

The move is expected to provide relief to students whose academic journey may be disrupted by health issues, personal emergencies, family responsibilities, or other unforeseen circumstances. By allowing an additional year, the medical regulator aims to accommodate genuine cases of delay while ensuring that students have a fair opportunity to complete their professional education.

Notably, the NMC has not proposed any changes to the existing rule governing the First Professional MBBS examination. Students will continue to be restricted to a maximum of four attempts to clear the examination conducted at the end of the first academic year. Medical education experts believe that retaining this provision safeguards academic rigor and ensures that educational standards are not diluted despite the proposed extension.

The draft amendment has been published in the Gazette of India and placed in the public domain for consultation. The Nhttps://edinbox.com/index.php/council/allied-healthcare-gahc/6046-national-medical-commission-approves-6-850-new-mbbs-seats-for-2025-26MC has invited comments and suggestions from medical colleges, faculty members, students, healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders. Objections and recommendations submitted within 30 days of the notification will be reviewed before a final decision is taken.

The proposed revision comes nearly three years after the implementation of the competency-based Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, which introduced the nine-year cap on MBBS completion.

Experts view the amendment as a balanced approach that recognizes the challenges faced by a small section of students while preserving the integrity of medical education. If approved, the revised regulation could offer much-needed flexibility without compromising the quality of training required for future doctors.