Retailers have warned against extremely cheap screen protectors, priced as low as Re. 1, due to their potential to damage smartphone screens. These low-quality protectors, often made of subpar materials, have been found to leave bubbles, scratches, and even damage the screen's oleophobic coating.
Concerns have been raised regarding such protectors' suitability for high-end smartphones. The materials used in their construction have been deemed inadequate, and their thickness, typically ranging from 0.1-0.2 mm, has been criticized for being insufficient.
In contrast, oil-based screen protectors have been recommended for their superior durability and effectiveness. Their ability to provide resistance to fingerprints and smudges, as well as their ease of installation, has been highlighted. The benefits of oil-based protectors have been emphasized, including their capacity to last up to six months.
Retailers have advised consumers to prioritize screen protection and invest in reputable brands. The importance of selecting protectors with key features such as a 0.3-0.5 mm thickness, 9H hardness rating, oleophobic coating, and anti-fingerprint and anti-scratch properties has been stressed.
Several brands, including Zupashi, Tempered Glass, Spigen, and OtterBox, have been identified as offering high-quality oil-based screen protectors. These protectors have been priced between ₹50-₹300, indicating a significant difference in quality and price compared to the Re. 1 protector.
The risks associated with using cheap screen protectors have been underscored. Damage to smartphone screens can result in costly repairs, highlighting the importance of investing in reliable protection. Consumers have been cautioned against compromising on quality and instead opting for protectors that provide adequate protection.
The rise of high-end smartphones has increased the need for adequate screen protection. As a result, retailers have emphasized the necessity of selecting screen protectors that meet specific standards. By doing so, consumers can ensure their smartphones remain protected and functional.
Key statistics and findings include:
- Over 75% of smartphone users reported damage to their screens within the first year of ownership.
- Cheap screen protectors have been linked to increased screen damage and repair costs.
- Oil-based protectors have been shown to provide up to 50% better protection than cheaper alternatives.
By choosing high-quality oil-based screen protectors, consumers can safeguard their smartphones against damage and ensure optimal performance.