IIT Madras Director's comments on Cow Urine Ignite Controversy

IIT Madras Director V Kamakoti has found himself at the center of a storm after making controversial remarks about the medicinal properties of cow urine, or gomutra. His statements, made during a Mattu Pongal event in Chennai, have drawn sharp criticism from various political figures, rationalist groups, and sections of the public.

Kamakoti, in his speech, claimed that cow urine has antibacterial and antifungal properties. He shared an anecdote about an ascetic who allegedly cured a high fever by drinking cow urine, sparking outrage among critics. The IIT director’s comments were seen by many as promoting unverified and scientifically dubious claims, leading to widespread condemnation.

The remarks quickly drew criticism from politicians across the spectrum. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader TKS Elangovan accused the central government of trying to “spoil” the education system by endorsing such pseudoscientific beliefs. Congress MP Karti Chidambaram also weighed in, tweeting that Kamakoti’s comments were “unbecoming of an IIT director” and accusing him of promoting pseudoscience.

Rationalist groups have also expressed dismay, calling for accountability from a leading academic institution. They argue that such claims, especially when made by someone in a position of authority, could undermine the scientific credibility of institutions like IIT Madras.

In defense of Kamakoti, Tamil Nadu BJP chief K Annamalai stated that the IIT director was merely expressing his personal views and had not intended to encourage anyone to consume cow urine. Sources close to Kamakoti further clarified that his comments were part of a broader discussion on organic farming and traditional practices, and that he had not advocated for cow urine consumption as a remedy for ailments.

Despite the clarifications, the controversy shows no signs of abating. Supporters of Kamakoti argue that academic freedom should allow personal expression, while his critics continue to call for greater responsibility from public figures in positions of scientific leadership.

As the debate rages on, the controversy over Kamakoti’s remarks raises important questions about the role of traditional beliefs in modern education, especially when they clash with scientific principles. This is a developing story, and more updates will follow as the situation unfolds.