The Difference Between Fact-Checking Tools & Artificial Intelligence

  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Fact-checking tools and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are interconnected yet distinct concepts, each playing a crucial role in today’s information-driven world. Understanding their differences and how they complement each other is essential for grasping their impact on verifying information and advancing technology.

Fact-checking tools are software applications or websites specifically designed to verify the accuracy of various forms of information, such as news articles, social media posts, or public claims. These tools operate based on pre-defined rules, algorithms, and extensive databases. By cross-referencing information against these databases, fact-checking tools can quickly determine the veracity of a statement and provide a verdict, often categorized as true, false, or partially true. Prominent examples of such tools include Snopes and PolitiFact. These platforms have become essential in combating misinformation and ensuring that the public has access to accurate information.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), on the other hand, is a broad field within computer science that focuses on creating intelligent machines capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. These tasks include learning, problem-solving, decision-making, and more. AI encompasses a wide range of applications beyond fact-checking, such as natural language processing, image recognition, and predictive analytics. AI systems are designed to analyze large volumes of data, identify patterns, and make predictions or decisions. Unlike traditional fact-checking tools, AI systems are not limited to pre-defined rules and databases; they can learn from data and improve their performance over time, which enhances their adaptability and efficacy in various domains.

The primary distinction between fact-checking tools and AI lies in their scope and functionality. Fact-checking tools are specialized applications focused on verifying facts, whereas AI represents a general technology applicable across multiple fields. Fact-checking tools depend on static rules and established databases to evaluate information, providing clear verdicts about the accuracy of specific claims. In contrast, AI systems utilize machine learning algorithms to process data, learn from it, and make informed predictions or recommendations. While AI can enhance fact-checking processes by analyzing vast datasets and identifying trends, it may not always provide the definitive verdicts that traditional fact-checking tools offer.

While fact-checking tools and AI are related through their use of advanced technologies, they serve different purposes and operate in distinct ways. Fact-checking tools are tailored applications that utilize AI technologies to verify facts and deliver clear outcomes. AI, as a broader field, encompasses various applications, including but not limited to fact-checking. The integration of AI into fact-checking tools represents a significant advancement, enabling these tools to handle larger datasets and improve accuracy over time. Understanding the unique roles and capabilities of each helps in appreciating their contributions to ensuring information accuracy and advancing technological innovation.

Fact-checking tools are often trusted more than artificial intelligence (AI) for several reasons, including transparency, accountability, familiarity, and the perceived reliability of human judgment. Here’s a detailed examination of these factors:


  1. **Transparency and Explainability:**

   Fact-checking tools are generally more transparent in their processes. Users can see the steps taken to verify information, such as cross-referencing claims with established databases and citing sources. This transparency helps build trust as users can understand and follow the logic behind the verification process. In contrast, AI systems, especially those based on complex machine learning algorithms, often operate as "black boxes." The decision-making process of AI can be opaque, making it difficult for users to understand how conclusions are reached.

  1. **Accountability:**

   Fact-checking tools are often operated by reputable organizations with a track record of journalistic integrity, such as Snopes,, and PolitiFact. These organizations are staffed by human fact-checkers who can be held accountable for their work. If a mistake is made, there is a clear path for correction and accountability. On the other hand, AI systems can lack this level of accountability. When AI makes an error, it is harder to pinpoint responsibility and ensure corrective measures, leading to potential mistrust among users.

  1. **Familiarity and Trust in Human Judgment:**

   People have a longstanding trust in human judgment, particularly from experts in fields such as journalism and research. Human fact-checkers bring contextual understanding, critical thinking, and ethical considerations to their work. Fact-checking tools, which rely on human oversight, benefit from this trust. AI, despite its advanced capabilities, may not always match the nuanced understanding and ethical decision-making of humans. This gap can cause skepticism regarding AI-generated conclusions.

  1. **Perceived Reliability:**

   Fact-checking tools have established a reputation for reliability over time by consistently providing accurate and verified information. Users often see these tools as extensions of the trustworthy institutions that back them. AI, while rapidly advancing, is still relatively new in the public domain for fact-checking purposes. High-profile errors and instances of bias in AI systems have also contributed to skepticism about their reliability. Users may be wary of AI's potential for errors and its susceptibility to manipulation.

  1. **Bias and Ethical Concerns:**

   AI systems can inherit biases from the data they are trained on, leading to skewed or inaccurate outputs. These biases can be subtle and difficult to detect, further undermining trust. Fact-checking tools, being operated by humans, are perceived to be better at recognizing and mitigating bias through critical analysis and ethical considerations. 

While both fact-checking tools and AI have their roles in combating misinformation, the former’s transparency, accountability, and the established trust in human judgement make them more trusted by the public. AI’s potential, however, is immense, and with continued advancements in explainability and ethics, it may gain greater trust over time. For now, the complementary use of both technologies offers a robust approach to ensuring the reliability of information in an increasingly complex media landscape.