Madras High Court orders ₹25 Lakh Compensation to Anna University Sexual Assault Survivor

The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to pay ₹25 lakh in compensation to a 19-year-old student who was allegedly sexually assaulted on the Anna University campus on December 23, 2024.

The court's directive also addressed the mishandling of the case, particularly the leak of the survivor's identity, which exacerbated her trauma. In a scathing critique of the investigation, the court reprimanded Chennai Police Commissioner A. Arun and announced the formation of an all-women Special Investigation Team (SIT) to handle the dual investigations into the assault and the leak.

The SIT, led by IPS officers Sneha Priya, Ayman Jamal, and Brinda, has been tasked with conducting a comprehensive probe into both the assault and the breach of the survivor's confidentiality. This measure aims to ensure accountability and transparency in the handling of such sensitive cases.

Additionally, the court has ordered Anna University to extend substantial support to the survivor, including free education, boarding, lodging, and access to counseling services. These directives are intended to help the survivor continue her studies without financial or emotional barriers.

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has also taken suo motu cognizance of the case. In response, the commission has established a two-member fact-finding committee to investigate the assault and assess safety measures at educational institutions.

This case has triggered widespread outrage across the country, highlighting the urgent need for stronger safety protocols on university campuses. The court’s decision has been widely hailed as a significant step toward justice, not only for the survivor but also in setting a precedent for addressing such incidents with seriousness and sensitivity.

The assault has reignited debates on the safety of women in educational institutions, with many advocating for stricter measures, including increased surveillance, gender sensitization programs, and robust grievance redressal mechanisms.

As the SIT begins its investigation, all eyes are on its findings and the measures that follow to ensure accountability and prevent such incidents in the future. The court’s proactive stance is being viewed as a critical move to bolster trust in the judicial system and provide hope to survivors seeking justice.