A special conversation with Dr Manish Mohan Gore, senior scientist, writer, and science communicator at CSIR–National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (NIScPR).
For nearly three decades, Dr Manish Mohan Gore has been at the forefront of India’s science communication movement, working to bridge the gap between laboratories and society. A scientist by training and a communicator by choice, Dr Gore currently leads research and studies in the Science Communication Division at the New Delhi–based CSIR–National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR-NIScPR). Despite holding a PhD in Botany, he has dedicated his career to science writing, editing, and popularisation.
Dr Gore has authored several acclaimed books on environmental science, biographies of scientists, animal behaviour, Indian science, biodiversity, and science fiction. His contributions have earned him multiple prestigious honours, including the Sir C.V. Raman Award for Technical Writing, the Rajbhasha Gaurav Award, and the Jagpati Chaturvedi Award for Children’s Science Writing.
EdInbox correspondent Rais Ahmed ‘Lali’ spoke to Dr Gore—also the editor of the Hindi science magazine Vigyan Pragati—about his journey, the challenges of science communication, and why communicating science can be more demanding than doing science itself.
How did your journey in science communication begin? What inspired you to take this path?
I have always been a student of science, but growing up in a house filled with books—and influenced deeply by my father’s love for literature—I naturally gravitated towards reading and writing. Over time, this literary inclination evolved into an interest in science literature and communication.
In 1997, while pursuing my BSc, I came into contact with several experienced science writers. Around the same time, my association with the National Council for Science and Technology Communication (NCSTC) played a crucial role in giving direction to the science communicator and writer within me. My father, Shrichand Gore, who was an English literature teacher and a freelance journalist, encouraged the writer in me indirectly.
That said, he was hesitant about me choosing writing as a career, believing it to be financially uncertain. In many ways, science communication began as a passion rather than a profession. But eventually, I had the opportunity to serve in a dedicated science communication institution. This alignment between personal interest and professional responsibility has been deeply fulfilling and productive.
What was the most important turning point that led you from botany to science writing and communication?
Botany was my core academic discipline, and I was always fascinated by plant diversity, biological processes, and the science behind them. My journey into science writing began around 1994, when I started explaining plant science in simple, accessible language for the general public.
Gradually, my writing expanded to include zoology, animal behaviour, environmental issues, Indian science, and the contributions of Indian scientists. A key turning point came when I realised that science writing could be an effective way to draw children and adolescents towards scientific thinking. I began writing regularly for magazines and journals, and that phase became a defining milestone—one that firmly set me on the path of science communication.
What kind of research and projects are you leading at CSIR-NIScPR?
CSIR-NIScPR is one of India’s leading institutions for science communication and science policy research, with a legacy of nearly 75 years. It publishes three popular science magazines—Vigyan Pragati (Hindi), Science Reporter (English), and Science Ki Duniya (Urdu).
Alongside my role as editor of Vigyan Pragati, I am involved in research on science communication in Indian languages and projects documenting the scientific achievements of Indian laboratories.
What role has your institution played in strengthening science communication in India?
CSIR established the Publications and Information Directorate (PID) in 1951, just four years after Independence, with the objective of taking scientific research to society. That same institution has evolved into today’s NIScPR.
Its contributions include publishing science magazines, research journals, and popular science books. One notable initiative is the India’s Wealth book series, which documents the country’s natural resources—minerals, flora, and fauna. The National Science Library, another key initiative of NIScPR, provides ISSN registration to journals across the country. These efforts underline NIScPR’s central role in strengthening science communication nationwide.
What major changes have you observed in science writing and editing over the years?
Sustained efforts in science communication have helped generate public interest in science and technology—subjects that were once perceived as inaccessible or intimidating. Science communication has connected children and young people with scientific research, leading many to pursue innovation in emerging scientific and technological fields.
People from modest backgrounds are now using scientific knowledge to create startups, innovate in agriculture, and pursue entrepreneurship. These are some of the most encouraging societal transformations driven by science communication.
What is the biggest challenge in making science simple and engaging for the general public?
The biggest challenge is explaining scientific concepts and theories in a way that people can understand. This is where science communication becomes critical—and difficult. In my view, science communication and writing are more complex than scientific research itself.
Scientific research follows a defined methodology and framework, but science communication does not. You may have to explain a concept to a tribal community member, a farmer, or a child with no formal science education. This requires simple language, cultural sensitivity, and real-life examples. That is both the challenge—and the solution—of science communication.
What steps are needed to take Indian science communication to the global stage?
India already runs world-class science communication programmes. In fact, several initiatives undertaken here are unique globally—such as multi-level science model development for children at district, state, and national levels, and science outreach among tribal communities. These are pioneering efforts that the world can learn from.
How can science communicators raise awareness about environmental challenges?
They play a vital role. Environmental issues can be communicated through stories, poetry, humour, and theatre to reach wider audiences. Science fiction is a particularly powerful tool for building environmental awareness and imagination.
Your science fiction works are well received. What role does science fiction play in Indian society?
Science fiction narrates the story of tomorrow—it presents a vision of society shaped by science and technology. It acts as a warning narrative, taking readers through a dramatic, engaging journey into futures filled with possibility, excitement, and risk. Science fiction encourages societies—not just in India, but globally—to maintain a rational balance alongside technological progress.
Can science fiction help develop scientific thinking among children and youth?
Absolutely. Science fiction presents a fictional yet inevitable future that encourages readers to reflect on present behaviour and make responsible changes. In this way, it becomes a powerful medium for cultivating scientific temper among children and young people.
What new skills are required for science communication in the digital era?
Digital and social media are merely platforms for delivering content—be it science, literature, or art. What matters is that science communication adapts to these platforms while maintaining credibility and authenticity. Important work is already being done in this direction.
Do you believe a gap still exists between science and society?
Yes, the gap exists, but it has narrowed significantly compared to the past. As public scientific understanding grows, this distance will continue to shrink—and science communication will play a decisive role in that process.
What advice would you give to young science writers and researchers?
Rather than advice, I would offer a simple suggestion: write about scientific issues that directly affect people’s lives. For instance, farmers often suffer back and joint pain due to prolonged bending during fieldwork—writing about tools or techniques that can alleviate this is meaningful science communication.
To researchers, I would say: communicate the social relevance of your work. Share it through short articles, videos, reels, poems, or stories. These small efforts will not only benefit society but will also give you a deep sense of fulfilment—one you may never have experienced before.