Gujarat’s growing sporting ambitions stand in sharp contrast to its limited presence in the Sports Authority of India (SAI) network. The state has only two SAI centres — both National Centres of Excellence (NCOEs) — and no SAI Training Centre (STC), extension centre, regional school or akhada listed in the national network.

The two NCOEs are located at Gandhinagar and Naranpura. While Gujarat has been working to expand sports participation and develop athletes as it eyes the 2036 Olympic Games, the limited institutional network could pose challenges in creating a wider talent-development pipeline across the state.

In comparison, states such as Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana have a broader spread of SAI facilities, providing athletes with access to training and support infrastructure across multiple locations.

The infrastructure constraints are also visible at SAI Gandhinagar. According to sources at the centre, only one of the four blocks of the Veer Savarkar Sports Complex has been allotted to SAI. This further limits the space available for SAI’s training and athlete-development activities in the state.

The gap becomes more pronounced when coach strength is compared across major SAI locations. Gandhinagar has 30 SAI coaches, the lowest among the 14 locations for which coach numbers were provided in the Union government’s reply in Parliament.

Sonipat and Patiala have the highest coach strength among these locations, with 87 coaches each. Kolkata follows with 78, while Bengaluru and Delhi have 75 coaches each. Guwahati has 64 coaches and Imphal has 50.

The 30 coaches at Gandhinagar account for only around 4% of the 747 coaches listed across the 14 locations.

The disparity is significant given Gujarat’s efforts to strengthen its sporting ecosystem. The state has promoted mass-participation programmes and athlete-support initiatives aimed at identifying and nurturing sporting talent. However, the relatively small SAI footprint raises questions about the institutional support available to athletes as they move from grassroots participation to advanced training and elite competition.

SAI centres play an important role in providing structured coaching, training facilities and athlete-development opportunities. A wider network can help identify talent beyond major urban centres and provide athletes with more accessible pathways to specialised training.

For Gujarat, the challenge may therefore extend beyond increasing participation. As the state seeks to position itself as a potential host for the 2036 Olympics, expanding the institutional bridge between talent identification, coaching and elite-level preparation could become an important part of its sporting strategy.

The current SAI data highlights a clear gap between Gujarat’s aspirations and its existing national sports infrastructure. Closing that gap could be crucial if the state wants its Olympic ambitions to translate into a stronger and more geographically distributed athlete-development ecosystem.

Meta description (100 characters):
Gujarat has only two SAI centres and 30 coaches, highlighting a sports infrastructure gap.

SEO keywords:

  1. Gujarat SAI centres
  2. Sports Authority of India
  3. Gujarat 2036 Olympics
  4. SAI Gandhinagar
  5. Gujarat sports infrastructure

A song is an entertainment but the meaning it hides within is the literature that fuels revolution. There are songs we hear and forget, and then there are songs that follow us long after the music has stopped. “Gaon Chodab Nahi” meaning  “We Will Not Leave Our Village”,  is one of the latter. The protest song emerged from struggles against displacement and the exploitation of tribal land and forests, and is resonating with a new audience in a time when India is grappling with an increasingly complex development conversation. The words are easy to read, almost insistent on being repeated, but the question under them is not easy: What happens when the cost of development is someone's home?

The song has been associated with Adivasi and anti-displacement movements for decades. It is about communities that are not willing to give up their land, forests, livelihoods and culture for projects that are marketed as progress. The message has spread through people's movements and performances, and now, as clips and recordings spread through social media, it is reaching young Indians who may never have heard the song in its original context. It's important to renew the focus because the generation that shares it is being raised in a nation where the term development is omnipresent, but the effects of development are becoming inescapable.

What is the reason behind the viral success of “Gaon Chodab Nahi”?

The resurgence of “Gaon Chodab Nahi” with the younger generation is not just about finding an old protest song. It's finding an old question at a very contemporary time. Gen Z has been told that development is about bigger cities, more industries, highways, technology, extraction and economic growth. This generation is also experiencing polluted air, disappearing green spaces, stressed rivers, extreme weather and increasing anxiety about what kind of planet will be left for them.

This contradiction adds a new emotional life to the song. The words of a community that refuses to abandon its village can start to feel more like a challenge to the concept of progress than a political slogan. If a forest has to disappear, a community has to relocate and generations of cultural memory have to be broken for a project to be completed, can the project be called successful simply because it produces economic value? The song does not give a technical solution. It does more than that, it makes us ask the question.

The Problem Is Not Development. It is Development Without People.

India needs development. It requires improved roads, industries, electricity, employment, hospitals, technology and infrastructure. It would be neither realistic nor fair to a country with millions of people who still have limited access to opportunity to reject development altogether. However, there is a distinction between opposing development and challenging the nature of development that sees people as a hindrance.

Displacement is more than just a move for communities whose lives are intricately tied to forests and ancestral land. Family history, livelihood, language, rituals, memories and identity can be carried by land. A forest can be a source of food, medicine, work and cultural knowledge. A river can be part of the history of a community. These connections are lost, and compensation can replace a loss of money, but not a loss of belonging.

This is where “Gaon Chodab Nahi” turns into more than a protest song. It gives a human voice to something that official language can make sound strangely harmless. Land acquisition. Rehabilitation. Displacement. Project-affected families. They can be required in policy documents, but they can also make a very personal experience sound administrative. 

What is the meaning of “Gaon Chodab Nahi” for young India?

The most compelling aspect of the song is that young people are not simply consuming it as history.. They are reading it in the light of their own problems. The song starts to take on new significance as soon as it reaches the ears of a new generation that is asking questions about climate change, inequality, sustainability and the costs of endless consumption.

What kind of future are we creating when the people who already inhabit the land have to vanish to make room for it?

Not all mining projects, industrial projects, roads and infrastructure developments are destructive. It implies that development should not be assessed solely on the basis of what has been built at the completion of a project. It should also be evaluated on the impact on people, ecosystems and communities on the journey. A nation is not developed just because it has constructed more. It must also question what it has safeguarded.

Art Starts Doing the Work of a Question

This is where the song's political message is not enough. Statistics can't tell the story as well as art can. A report can tell us the number of families displaced. Rehabilitation can be explained in a policy document. The law can be decided by a court. However, a song can evoke the sense of homelessness.

Hence, protest music has always been important. It makes an issue an experience. It makes something happen to people we may never meet and puts it in our emotional world. One day, land is no longer simply land. A forest is more than a natural resource. A village is more than a place on a map. They turn into places where people lived, where they remember a parent, where they learned a song, where they imagine their children growing up. “Gaon Chodab Nahi” brings that feeling to life.

The Song Is Asking India to Rethink Progress

The most uncomfortable question raised by the song is not whether India should develop. It is whether we have become too ready to say that all construction progress is progress. We celebrate what is built, but seldom ask who paid the price for building it. We measure highways in kilometres, industrial projects in investment and cities in economic output. But what about another measure of development: how much human dignity, ecological balance and community life does it retain?

A better model of development would not force India to opt for growth at the expense of its citizens. It would require more responsible, participatory and sustainable growth. Communities should not be seen as barriers because they reside in the area where a project is being proposed. Opposition to progress is not the same as environmental concerns. Indigenous communities should not be asked to continually demonstrate the value of their relationship with their land.

Why Gen Z Is Sharing an Old Song

It's almost like a poetic journey for an old protest song to pass through the phones of a generation that lives in a different kind of India. The technology is new. It's a new platform. The audience is new. However, the wound that the song speaks of is not new.

That may be why it's seeping into the minds of the young. They are starting to realize that the future they are talking about in classrooms, boardrooms and government offices is their future as well. They will inherit the cities we build, the rivers we save or pollute, the forests we save or destroy, and the social inequalities we face or ignore.

The song thus turns into more than a historical record; it turns into a dialogue between generations. The singers of the song decades ago were asking that they not be erased by development. The youth listening today are asking what kind of development they want to pass on to their own children.

“Gaon Chodab Nahi” Is Not Anti-Development. It Is a Call for Better Development.

This may be the difference India most needs. A report can tell us how many families were displaced. A policy document can explain rehabilitation. A court can determine legal rights. But a song can make us feel what losing home means.. The solution is to grow without destroying as the cost of growth.

That's about building infrastructure without harming ecosystems, developing industries without disregarding communities, providing economic opportunity without accepting displacement as a given, and leveraging technology to enhance human life, not just consumption. It means recognising that a village is not empty land waiting for a project. It already has a life in it.

Maybe that's why the song is so strong today. “Gaon Chodab Nahi” is not just a statement of “We will not leave our village.” It asks, “Why do we have to leave it for progress to take place?”

The Art Is Leading the Call for a Better India

The best thing about art is that it doesn't always tell us what to think. Sometimes, it just won't let us quit thinking. A protest song can outlast governments, projects, campaigns and generations because its emotional truth is not dependent on a specific time.

“Gaon Chodab Nahi” is rediscovering that truth among the young listeners. Maybe they're sharing it because they see something in its words that they don't like. Maybe they are starting to realize that development that undermines the conditions of human life can't be forever celebrated as progress. Maybe they're learning what artists have always learned: that a song can be a weapon of resistance, but it can also be a blueprint for imagination.

India needs that imagination. It requires young people who are not against growth, but against the growth that is too expensive; who are not against change, but against the change that is not good enough; who are not against inheriting the country, but against inheriting the country to leave it behind.

After all, “Gaon Chodab Nahi” is not just a matter of not leaving a village. It's about not wanting to live in a world where someone's house, their culture, their forest or their dignity is traded for another person's development.

Maybe that's why an old song is saying so much these days… because the future is a revolution through entertainment!

A proposed screening of filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri’s ‘The Bengal Files’ at Jadavpur University on August 16 has triggered a fresh controversy on the campus, with left-leaning student organisations opposing the event while the university administration maintains that no final decision has been taken.

The Nationalist Students' Front (NSF), which is organising the proposed screening, said on Thursday that it had obtained permission from the university administration to screen the film at the Triguna Sen Auditorium on Sunday.

However, a university official said the administration was yet to take a decision on the matter.

NSF claims permission for screening

NSF spokesperson Somsurya Banerjee said the university's Film Studies department had indicated that the film could be screened and that the student organisation subsequently received permission from the administration.

“I think it is for the right of students to think, question and decide for themselves,” Banerjee said.

The university authorities have not publicly confirmed the organisation's claim. An official said the administration had received the NSF's request but had not yet taken a final call.

The proposed screening has therefore become a point of contention ahead of the August 16 event.

Left student groups oppose screening

The Students' Federation of India (SFI), affiliated with the CPI(M), and the Revolutionary Students' Federation (RSF) of the CPI(ML) Liberation have raised objections to the proposed screening.

SFI's Jadavpur University local committee secretary Abhinaba Basu said the organisation was not in favour of censorship but urged the university to ensure that the campus atmosphere remained peaceful.

Basu also expressed concern over screening a film that, according to the organisation, carries a narrative that could promote polarisation and division.

RSF's Jadavpur University unit secretary Indranuj Ray separately wrote to the Vice-Chancellor opposing permission for the event.

The organisation argued that such a screening could affect the university's secular and inclusive campus environment.

Film based on 1946 Calcutta violence

‘The Bengal Files’ is centred on the 1946 Great Calcutta Killings, which followed the Muslim League's Direct Action Day call and resulted in widespread communal violence in the city.

The film's proposed screening at Jadavpur University has consequently drawn attention amid competing views over freedom of expression, campus harmony and the portrayal of a highly sensitive period in Bengal's history.

While NSF maintains that students should have the opportunity to watch and assess the film themselves, opposing student groups have urged the administration to consider the potential impact on the campus environment.

For now, the university has confirmed only that it has received the screening request. No final decision on whether the event will be permitted has been officially announced.

 

A Class 12 student’s emotional account of missing an international Taekwondo tournament has triggered a political controversy in Uttarakhand after the Congress alleged that she was asked to pay a bribe. A subsequent video by the student, however, offered a fuller account and did not describe the money as a bribe.

Shayra, a student of CNI Girls School, raised the issue during Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami’s ‘Mukhyamantri Yuva Vidyarthi Manthan’ programme in Dehradun on August 10.

Speaking before the Chief Minister and cameras, Shayra said she had won a gold medal at a national Taekwondo competition and was subsequently selected to participate in an international tournament. However, she said she could not participate because she was unable to arrange Rs 1.5 lakh.

The student became emotional while narrating her experience. Dhami consoled her and directed officials to collect details about her school and examine the matter.

Congress Alleges Bribe Demand

The Congress subsequently interpreted Shayra’s remarks as an allegation that she had been asked to pay Rs 1.5 lakh as a bribe to participate in the international event.

The party criticised the BJP-led Uttarakhand government and alleged that corruption had prevented a national-level gold medallist from representing India internationally.

The Congress also claimed that the live broadcast of the event was later removed from the social media accounts of the government, the Chief Minister and the BJP.

However, Shayra’s remarks at the programme did not explicitly identify the Rs 1.5 lakh as a bribe, nor did she name any individual or official as having demanded the money.

Student’s Later Video Clarifies Account

Shayra later released another video explaining that she had not been able to complete her account while speaking before the Chief Minister.

According to her later explanation, she had travelled to Jammu for the national championships, where she was selected for an international tournament in Romania.

She said the organisation associated with the event had agreed to cover approximately Rs 1.70 lakh of the expenses. She was required to arrange the remaining Rs 1.5 lakh herself.

Shayra said she had not informed her school or other people about the opportunity at the time. As a result, she could not arrange the remaining amount and was unable to travel to Romania for the tournament.

Her subsequent explanation did not allege that the Rs 1.5 lakh was a bribe or that a government official had demanded the money.

Instead, she described the amount as her share of the expenses required to participate in the international competition.

Political Controversy Continues

The contrasting interpretations of Shayra’s initial remarks and subsequent clarification have turned the incident into a political issue in Uttarakhand.

While the Congress has used the incident to question the state government over alleged corruption and support for sportspersons, the student’s later account presents the Rs 1.5 lakh as a contribution towards tournament-related expenses rather than an alleged bribe.

The episode has also raised questions about the importance of providing timely financial and institutional support to young athletes selected for international competitions.

 

A classroom activity involving the inspection of students' lunch boxes has gone viral after a teacher discovered that almost every child had brought a potato-based meal to school. The video has since triggered widespread discussions on children's nutrition, the affordability of healthy food, and the challenges families face in preparing balanced school lunches.

Shared on X by the account Being Humour, the video shows the teacher walking around the classroom as young students eagerly present their lunch boxes. She helps some children open their tiffins before checking what they have brought for lunch.

Aloo Dominates School Lunch Boxes

As the teacher examined each lunch box, a clear pattern emerged.

Most students had packed meals centred around potatoes, including:

  • Aloo sabzi
  • Aloo paratha
  • Mixed vegetable dishes with potatoes

Surprised by the similarity, the teacher repeatedly asked the children why nearly everyone had brought potatoes for lunch that day. The students quietly continued showing their meals while the teacher expressed her curiosity.

The video was captioned, "This video could be traumatic for protein paglus," suggesting concern over the apparent lack of protein-rich foods in the children's lunches.

Social Media Divided Over Nutrition

The viral clip quickly sparked a broader discussion online about what constitutes a healthy school lunch.

Many users argued that the issue goes beyond food choices and reflects the economic realities faced by many families. They pointed out that protein-rich foods such as paneer, soy products, pulses, beans, eggs, and dairy are often more expensive than potatoes, making them difficult to include regularly in children's lunch boxes.

Others noted that homemade potato-based meals are still healthier than highly processed alternatives such as instant noodles, packaged snacks, biscuits, or chips that are sometimes seen in school tiffins.

Experts Recommend Balanced Meals

Nutrition experts generally advise that children require a combination of carbohydrates, proteins, healthy fats, vitamins, and minerals for proper growth and development.

Potatoes provide carbohydrates that supply energy and also contain fibre, potassium, and vitamin C. However, relying heavily on potatoes without adequate protein and other nutrient-rich foods may limit the nutritional quality of a child's daily diet.

A balanced school lunch can include foods such as pulses, curd, eggs, sprouts, soy products, paneer, seasonal vegetables, fruits, and whole grains alongside carbohydrate-rich items.

A Reminder About Nutrition Awareness

The viral classroom video has highlighted an important conversation for parents, schools, and educators about children's eating habits. While affordability remains a genuine concern for many households, experts stress that nutrition education and awareness can help families create more balanced meals using locally available and budget-friendly ingredients.

The discussion also underscores the role schools can play in promoting healthy eating habits through nutrition awareness programmes and regular engagement with parents, ensuring students receive meals that support both learning and overall well-being.

Olympic medallist Manu Bhaker has sparked widespread discussion on social media after sharing a message about the importance of respectful language and personal conduct. Her post came amid an ongoing public debate following remarks by Narendra Modi regarding students who allegedly used abusive language during a recent protest at Jantar Mantar.

In a post shared on X, Bhaker wrote that the words people choose reflect their personality and eventually shape the kind of individuals they become.

"The language we choose reflects our personality and the kind of person we are. Choose your words wisely, because over time, you become what you think, what you speak and what you practice," she wrote.

The message quickly gained attention online, with many users interpreting it as a broader appeal for respectful public discourse and responsible communication, particularly among young people.

PM Modi calls protesting students "misguided children"

The discussion follows comments made by Prime Minister Modi, who said he and his late mother had been subjected to abusive remarks during protests at Jantar Mantar over alleged irregularities in the NEET examination.

Rather than advocating punitive action, the Prime Minister described the students involved as "misguided children", saying that legal proceedings or punishment would not solve the underlying problem.

In a video message shared later, Modi emphasized the need to guide young people instead of alienating them. Using an analogy, he said that just as people do not reject their teeth when they accidentally bite their tongue, society should not distance itself from its youth because they remain an integral part of the nation.

He encouraged students to acknowledge mistakes, learn from them and move forward positively.

Bhaker urges youth to redefine what is "cool"

Expanding on her message, Bhaker urged young people to rethink the meaning of being "cool."

According to the Olympic shooter, abusive language and disrespectful behaviour should never be viewed as admirable.

"Using bad language isn't cool. Abusing isn't cool. Let us keep the definition of cool simple: being hardworking, kind, respectful towards others and yourself, striving to be successful through honesty and making your parents and your country proud," she wrote.

Her comments have resonated with many users who praised the emphasis on discipline, integrity and respectful communication.

Focus on values and responsible expression

The exchange has added a broader dimension to the public conversation surrounding student protests and youth engagement. While debates continue over freedom of expression and the conduct witnessed during demonstrations, both Modi's remarks and Bhaker's message underline the importance of constructive dialogue, accountability and personal growth.

Bhaker's post reinforces the idea that language is not merely a tool for communication but also a reflection of character. Her message encourages young people to cultivate values such as honesty, kindness and respect while viewing mistakes as opportunities to learn rather than reasons for division.

The discussion continues to generate significant engagement on social media, highlighting the growing conversation around responsible communication, civic behaviour and the role of positive role models in shaping public discourse.

 

A Delhi teacher has won widespread admiration on social media after introducing a creative DIY attendance system that turns a routine classroom task into a fun and engaging activity for children.

Instead of calling out roll numbers or marking names in a register, the teacher uses a handmade self-attendance board made from matchboxes, allowing students to mark themselves present as they enter the classroom.

The video, shared on Instagram, has quickly gone viral, with many users praising the teacher’s passion, innovation and child-friendly approach to learning.

How the attendance board works

The attendance board is made using small matchboxes, each labelled with a student’s photograph.

Inside every box is a card showing either:

  • P for Present
  • A for Absent

In the video, the teacher enters the classroom first and marks herself present by sliding open her matchbox. The students then enter one by one and open their respective boxes to reveal the letter P, indicating that they are present for the day.

For students who are absent, the letter A remains visible on the board.

The post was captioned: “My little ones taking charge.”

Turning attendance into a learning activity

What appears to be a simple classroom hack has drawn attention because of the educational value behind it.

Teachers and parents online noted that the activity helps children:

  • Take ownership of their daily routine
  • Develop responsibility
  • Improve self-awareness
  • Participate actively from the moment they enter the classroom
  • Associate school with positive experiences

Many users felt that the idea was especially effective for primary school students, for whom visual and hands-on activities often work better than traditional administrative methods.

Internet calls it ‘out-of-the-box’

The video received a flood of appreciative comments.

One user wrote:

“What an amazing initiative and a way to take attendance, especially in primary school! Hats off to whoever brought this idea.”

Another commented:

“Wonderful and out-of-the-box idea.”

A third user said:

“Very innovative idea.”

One remark that resonated widely read:

“When you work for passion, not for money.”

Others joked that the same attendance system should be introduced in universities and offices.

Small innovation, big impact

The viral video has struck a chord not because of expensive technology or smart classroom tools, but because of a low-cost, handmade idea that makes children feel involved.

In an education system often focused on exams and administration, the teacher’s matchbox attendance board is being celebrated as a reminder that creativity, empathy and engagement can make even the smallest classroom routine meaningful.

For many viewers, the lesson was not just about attendance—it was about how thoughtful teaching can make students eager to participate from the very first minute of the school day.

More Articles ...