As demand for healthcare professionals particularly in allied health sciences increases, Indian students are no longer relying on conventional entry points in healthcare services such as NEET. Global Allied Healthcare Entrance Test (GAHET 2025) has become the first country-wide entrance exam of India in the field of allied health courses. But what is the comparison between GAHET and NEET and which one is better and preferable to Gen Z medical aspirants? 

What is the NEET entrance exam?

NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) is the most popular entrance exam for undergraduate medical (MBBS), dental (BDS), and some allied health courses in India. It is conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA). The subjects covered in this exam are Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. To be eligible for taking NEET, students must have passed 10+2 with Physics, Chemistry, Biology/Biotechnology and English. Usually this medical entrance exam is conducted in May every year and the application is through the NTA NEET portal, 

What is GAHET?

GAHET (Global Allied Healthcare Entrance Test) is a pioneering entrance exam designed specifically for students aspiring to build careers in allied health sciences. Unlike NEET, which is primarily for MBBS and BDS admissions, GAHET opens doors to a variety of paramedical and allied health courses. The subjects covered in this exam are Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and English. To be eligible for taking this paramedical entrance exam, the candidates must meet criteria set by the conducting authority (details on gahet.org ). The exam can be given any month, as per one's convenience. 

Difference between GAHET and NEET

Why GAHET is best for GenZ paramedical aspirants?

Global Allied Healthcare Entrance Exam is a 100% online exam with no negative marking. It is suitable for all the genZ who have a different view of exams. Through this paramedical entrance exam students get easy admission in the top Private paramedical  colleges. All the aspirants who wish to pursue a career in healthcare but do not wish to be a doctor or a nurse,  there are many other opportunities in healthcare that pay much better and hold similar significance as that of a doctor and a nurse. To pursue such a career, students don’t need to take NEET, they can simply opt for a decent entrance test like GAHET if they believe they have all the skills/ potential and NEET didn’t go well for them or NEET is not something they are willing to take.  

Reasons to Give GAHET over NEET

1. Contemporary, Student-Centered Practice: 

GAHET has been developed with a view of the current students. The exam pattern is not as rote as before, but tests all round aptitude, ability and English language proficient-abilities which are so important in any global healthcare career.

1. Broader Career Choices:

NEET is a gateway to MBBS and BDS but GAHET is a goldmine of opportunities to explore in the world of allied health sciences such as doors of physiotherapy, medical lab technology, radiology and so on. The demand for these careers in India and abroad is high.

1. Adaptable and open Procedure: 

GAHET application and examination is straightforward and clear, and all the information is posted on the gahet.org. The exam is done through several centres and it is easily reached by students around the country.

1. Employability-focus: 

The skills required to work in the contemporary healthcare sector are reflected in GAHET syllabus and evaluation style. This has made the students qualified in GAHET more industrial-ready and employable.

1. National First Allied Health Exam: 

The first of its kind is a national-level entrance in the allied health field called GAHET set in India, specialised and focused; thus, it should be preferred by a student who knows their career choice.

There is also a paramedical entrance test in AIIMS which is very competitive and is restricted to AIIMS campuses. The date of examination AIIMS Paramedical 2025 will be posted on the official site of AIIMS. But GAHET has a wider selection of allied health colleges which offer a wider variety of colleges in which students can select.

So Which Entrance Exam to take?

1. If you dream of becoming a doctor (MBBS/BDS): NEET is mandatory.
2. If you want a rewarding career in allied health sciences: GAHET is the best route, offering flexibility, modern assessment, and a Gen Z-friendly approach.
3. If you want to keep all options open: You can appear for both exams, as their schedules usually don’t clash

The medical field is advanced and the entrance tests are too. GAHET 2025 is nothing short of an alternative method to NEET and a movement towards the more accessible and appealing allied health careers among the young population of India. Are you a Gen Z professional who wants to have a dynamic and skill-based healthcare career that is future-ready? There could not be a better option other than GAHET.

To get further information and latest updates, refer to the official GAHET site.  

A student from Bengaluru has secured All-India Rank 10 in the prestigious Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2024, while also earning the distinction of being the top scorer in Karnataka.

The student, who has chosen to remain anonymous, has emerged as a shining example of dedication, hard work, and passion for the legal profession. His remarkable achievement is a source of pride for his family, school, and the entire state.

CLAT is a highly competitive national-level entrance exam for admission to undergraduate law programs at India’s top National Law Universities (NLUs). With thousands of aspirants vying for a limited number of seats, securing a top rank is a significant accomplishment that requires focused preparation, strong problem-solving skills, and deep conceptual understanding.

The success of this young achiever not only underscores his individual capabilities but also highlights the robust educational environment in Karnataka. The state is increasingly gaining recognition as a hub for legal education, with institutions fostering talent that excels on national platforms.

A spokesperson for the student’s school expressed immense pride in the accomplishment, stating, “This is a moment of great joy and pride for us. The student’s success reflects not only his unwavering commitment but also the support and quality education provided by the school. We congratulate him on this outstanding milestone.”

The student’s journey to success is expected to serve as an inspiration for aspiring law students across Karnataka and the country. His accomplishment showcases that with consistent effort and strategic preparation, even the most competitive exams can be conquered.

The achievement also brings attention to the growing interest among students in pursuing law as a career, a field that demands analytical thinking, ethical reasoning, and an understanding of societal dynamics. Karnataka’s education system continues to encourage such aspirations, fostering an ecosystem where students can thrive and achieve their goals.

As this young achiever embarks on his journey to study law at one of India’s premier National Law Universities, he stands as a role model for others aiming to make their mark in the field of legal studies. His success is a testament to the power of determination and the transformative impact of quality education.

As Generation Z (Gen Z) becomes a prominent part of the workforce, employers are being challenged to adapt to their distinct characteristics and expectations. Born between 1997 and 2012, this tech-savvy, pragmatic, and inclusive generation is reshaping workplace dynamics. Experts emphasise that organisations must focus on fostering essential skills, cultural competence, and sensitivity to effectively integrate Gen Z employees.  

Gen Z is characterised by their resilience and pragmatism, shaped by experiences of economic uncertainty and social change. They are notably diverse and inclusive, with a significant proportion identifying as LGBTQ+, people of colour, or individuals with disabilities. Their natural affinity for technology has made them proficient in digital tools and platforms, positioning them as critical drivers of digital transformation.  

To excel in today’s workforce, Gen Z employees must develop:  

• Digital Literacy: Proficiency in leveraging digital tools and platforms.  
• Communication Skills: Effective engagement with diverse colleagues and clients.  
• Problem-Solving Abilities: Critical and creative thinking to tackle complex challenges.  
• Collaboration: Building strong teamwork across cultural boundaries.   

Creating an inclusive and equitable environment is crucial to engaging Gen Z employees. Employers must:  

• Embrace diversity by valuing different perspectives and promoting equity.  
• Foster cultural awareness to understand and respect differences.  
• Encourage empathy through active listening and open communication.  

Adapting to Gen Z’s preferences involves proactive measures, such as:  

• Mentorship Programs: Pairing Gen Z employees with experienced mentors.  
• Focused Training: Enhancing digital literacy, communication, and problem-solving skills.  
• Flexible Work Options: Accommodating preferences for remote work and work-life balance.  

With Gen Z expected to comprise 30% of India’s workforce by 2025, their emphasis on diversity and flexibility will drive innovation and creativity. Employers who prioritise engagement strategies can enhance retention, attract top talent, and gain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.  

Key Statistics  

• 75% of Gen Z employees prioritise diversity and inclusion in the workplace.  
• 60% prefer flexible work arrangements.  
• By 2025, Gen Z will constitute 30% of India’s workforce.  

Embracing the strengths of Gen Z is not just a necessity but a pathway to thriving in the digital age.

Though five years' time has been allowed under the BNSS for modernizing the forensic facilities, ongoing investment is essential to upgrade the current forensic infrastructure in states.

The new criminal statutes have placed more stress on the application of scientific evidence in the investigation of criminal cases. It is now compulsory for a forensic expert to inspect the scene of crime in the case of crimes punishable with imprisonment for seven years or more, to gather forensic evidence and arrange videography of the process on mobile phone or any other electronic evidence.

It is also necessary to make photography and videography at the time of search and seizure during investigation mandatory. Any electronic evidence of secondary in nature, now also needs certification by a cyber expert. While five years' time has been allowed under the BNSS to enhance the forensic infrastructure, there is a need for continuous investment in upgrading the existing forensic facilities in the states.

Just recently, the Supreme Court (SC) suo moto took cognisance of a news report that brought to light some custodial deaths in the recent past, attributing the problem to non-functional CCTV cameras in police stations. SC in Paramvir Singh versus Baljit Singh (2020) had ordered all states to instal compulsorily and maintain CCTV cameras in police stations as a deterrent against custodial torture.

The verdict also directed to form oversight panels, at state and district levels to oversee installation, operation, budget requirements and maintenance of CCTV setups. The Court stated that CCTV recordings must be stored for at least six months, whereby a victim of violations of human rights could request access to such recordings.

The SC also issued some guidelines recently in Kattavellai @Devakar versus State of Tamil Nadu (2025) so that the DNA samples are collected and stored properly, and sent to the FSL within 48 hours of being collected while there is a good chain of custody. While the validity and reliability of a DNA profile are subject to quality control and procedure within the laboratory, the outside laboratory quality control and procedure are also critical, the Court reaffirmed. The MHA, in January 2019, under the pilot project, had distributed approximately 11,130 Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kits (SAECKs) under the BPR&D for improved collection, storage and handling of DNA evidence. In fact, the states always need money to purchase such kits in order to collect scientific evidence in investigation.

The Need For Funds

These references have been provided in order to support the fact that the police modernisation funds are always needed for the capacity building of the police forces. Different police reform committees and commissions, Law Commission, and the Supreme Court have re-iterated the request to the police to utilize scientific evidence in investigation.

It would not be an overstatement to state that the cybercrime reporting portal was introduced by the MHA in 2019 at the behest of the directions given by the Supreme Court to prevent the online circulation of pornography and rape videos.

Subsequently, its ambit was broadened and it was integrated with the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) so that action taken by the states is expedited on the police station level.

What Is Modernisation of Police Force Scheme

The scheme for Modernisation of Police Force (MPF) was initiated in the current shape by the MHA during the year 1999-2000 for a tenure of 10 years i.e., till 2009-10. The Bureau of Police Research & Development (BPR&D) was then requested to evaluate the effect of the scheme and provide further suggestions.

The Bureau carried out an independent analysis and also engaged the services of M/S Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd. to draw consolidated conclusions.

Although it was widely believed that 'the MPF scheme has benefited the police like nothing else in the past', the Bureau strongly suggested 'the continuation of the scheme with more funds for the LWE and terror infested states. It also suggested inclusion of special schemes for the border and coastal areas.

Why MPF Scheme Is Important For States

It cannot be held in dispute that the MPF scheme has served the states well by enhancing the mobility of the forces, upgrading telecommunication, enhancing weapons, computerisation (including CCTNS), training and security gadgets and enhancing FSLs.

Simultaneously, it is no less true that the police forces' strength has grown and issues proliferated over the years.

As 'Police' and 'Public order' are included in the Seventh Schedule State List of our Constitution, the major responsibility is with the states to make sure that the police can perform their functions effectively in accordance with the Constitutional mandate.

But the Union also has to see that the state government of each state is conducted in accordance with the Constitution provisions.

The Allocation Of Funds

Nowadays, the modernisation funds are released to union territories and states under the 'Assistance to States and UTs for Modernisation of Police' (ASUMP) scheme which is one of the schemes under the umbrella scheme of 'Modernisation of Police Forces' (MPF) run by the Central Government.

Although the Central Government continued the police modernisation programme without interruption, yearly allocations have nearly persistently fallen. Central share that stood at around Rs. 1,558 crores for 2012-13, fell to an all-time low of around 460 crores for 2023-24.

It is only after the implementation of new criminal legislations in July 2024 that Central share in the ASUMP for the year 2025-26 has been enhanced to Rs. 1,007 crores (with total annual plan size of Rs. 1603 crores).

Why Centre Needs To Help States

Though the Central Government has brought in the Public Fund Management System (PFMS) to harmoniously monitor the movement of funds from the Centre to states, it has not been proven to be very user-friendly.

The real expenditure of money has never been up to the allocation due to several obstacles inter-alia cancellation of tender on account of low participation, inability to provide equipment in time by the vendors, delay in sanctioning of proprietary materials and delay in the completion of building activities.

Although the functioning of the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal has become better after some time, most of the times Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) and Startups end up being unserious bidders since they are exempted from filing Bid Security (in the form of earnest money deposit).

The affected LWE states are also given financial support under different schemes like Security Related Expenditure (SRE), Special Central Assistance (SCA) and Special Infrastructure Scheme (SIS) like fortified police stations/outposts.

Though the states' expenditure relating to the anti-Maoist operations are being reimbursed in the ratio of 60:40, the grant provided by the Central Government under the SCA for plugging gaps in key security infrastructure is 100%.

Other programs under the MPF are Modernisation of Forensics and Modernisation of Prisons. While decrease in LWE violence and number of affected districts over time is an encouraging trend, the stream of funds for police modernisation has to pick up.

It is therefore argued that the bar of allocations under the police, forensics and prisons modernisation is increased by the Central Government to address a range of challenges including those due to new criminal laws and assist the states in discharging their Constitutional responsibilities.