As student debt rises worldwide, a growing number of Muslim students are confronting a dilemma that goes beyond economics—one rooted in faith. At the heart of the issue is riba (interest), prohibited in Islam, which directly conflicts with the structure of most modern student loan systems.

Across countries like the UK, where higher education increasingly depends on borrowing, the tension is becoming more visible. Under newer loan frameworks, students face decades-long repayments with accruing interest—turning what was once an educational decision into a moral one.

A System at Odds With Belief

Islamic teachings consider interest-based transactions unethical, viewing money as a medium of exchange rather than a commodity for profit. This places observant Muslim students in a difficult position: pursue higher education through loans and compromise religious values, or avoid debt and risk limiting career prospects.

The divide is not just personal—it extends to scholars. A study by the British Board of Islamic Scholars found nearly equal disagreement among Islamic authorities on whether student loans can be considered permissible, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

Choosing Between Opportunity and Obligation

For many students, the decision is shaped by circumstance.

Some, like aspiring law students from working-class backgrounds, justify taking loans under the Islamic principle of darurah—necessity—arguing that education is essential for financial stability and family support.

Others take a different path altogether.

A growing number are opting for degree apprenticeships, where tuition is funded and students earn while they learn. These alternatives, often offered in partnership with universities and corporations, allow students to graduate debt-free—sidestepping the ethical burden entirely.

Social Pressure and Silent Trade-offs

Rejecting traditional university routes, however, comes with its own challenges. Students report facing confusion and even criticism from peers and educators unfamiliar with the religious implications of interest.

In some cases, even within Muslim communities, interpretations differ—some viewing student loans as a form of “graduate tax” rather than prohibited interest.

This divergence leaves students navigating not just financial systems, but layers of social and theological interpretation.

Community Support and Emerging Awareness

University-based Islamic finance societies and advisory groups are increasingly stepping in to guide students through these decisions. They provide education on ethical finance, alternative funding routes, and religious perspectives—helping students make informed choices aligned with their beliefs.

At the same time, families are playing a more active role, with some stepping in to financially support education and avoid interest-based borrowing altogether.

Policy Gaps and Global Implications

Governments are beginning to acknowledge the issue. In the UK, policymakers have indicated plans to introduce alternative, faith-compliant student finance models under broader education reforms. However, implementation remains slow, leaving current students to make difficult choices in the meantime.

The challenge is not confined to one country. As higher education systems worldwide rely heavily on interest-based financing, similar dilemmas are emerging in other regions with significant Muslim populations.

The Road Ahead

The debate ultimately reflects a larger question:
Can modern financial systems adapt to accommodate diverse ethical and religious frameworks?

Until that question is answered, Muslim students across the globe will continue to walk a tightrope—balancing ambition with belief, and opportunity with conviction.

For many, the pursuit of education is no longer just about securing a future. It is about defining it—on their own terms.

The province of Ontario is weighing sweeping new restrictions on student technology use, with Education Minister Paul Calandra confirming that officials are exploring a province-wide cellphone ban in schools alongside a potential social media prohibition for children under 16.

In an interview on Focus Ontario, Calandra said the proposal would build on existing classroom rules that require phones to be kept out of sight. “Potentially a complete cell phone ban in our schools,” he noted, adding that social media restrictions are also under consideration as part of the same policy direction.

The move reflects a growing international trend to curb digital distraction and online dependency among students. Countries like Australia have already taken legislative steps—passing laws to enforce age limits on social media—while governments in the United Kingdom and France are examining similar frameworks.

At the federal level in Canada, Culture Minister Marc Miller has also indicated that Ottawa is “very seriously” considering a nationwide ban on social media use for children under 16. Calandra confirmed that Ontario is closely studying these developments, including policy experiments in parts of the United States.

Educators have been among the strongest advocates for tighter restrictions. According to the minister, teachers and school staff have raised concerns about the impact of smartphones on classroom discipline, student focus, and even safety in school corridors. He added that feedback from jurisdictions that have implemented bans suggests improved behaviour and responsibility among students.

Public opinion appears to support stricter controls. A recent survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that 75 per cent of Canadians favour a full social media ban for those under 16, with support remaining high at 70 per cent among parents. Similarly, a global poll by Ipsos reported that 71 per cent of respondents across 30 countries believe children under 14 should not access social media, highlighting widespread concern over its effects.

However, enforcement remains a key challenge. Matt Hatfield of the OpenMedia pointed to methods being tested internationally, including government ID verification, AI-based age estimation, and account activity indicators. Each approach, he noted, raises questions around privacy, accuracy, and feasibility.

While no final decision has been announced, Ontario’s deliberations signal a significant policy shift that could reshape how students engage with technology—both inside and outside the classroom.

In a move aimed at expanding global exposure and academic flexibility, University of Delhi is set to consider introducing a Semester Away Programme (SAP) that would allow undergraduate students to study at foreign universities as part of their degree. The proposal will be tabled at the upcoming Academic Council meeting, marking another step in aligning the university’s curriculum with international education standards.

The initiative is being proposed under the Undergraduate Curriculum Framework (UGCF) 2022, which itself is aligned with the National Education Policy 2020. While Delhi University has already implemented multiple exit options for students under NEP guidelines, the SAP aims to further enhance flexibility by enabling students to pursue a portion of their academic programme abroad.

According to university officials, the programme would allow students to spend one semester at a recognised foreign higher education institution (FHEI), provided they meet the academic requirements of their degree. Registrar Vikas Gupta stated that the proposal is designed to offer students broader opportunities, including internships, training, and exposure to diverse academic environments beyond India.

As per the draft proposal, students enrolled in undergraduate programmes from the 2022–23 academic session onwards will be eligible to participate. However, to ensure continuity and completion of their degree, the semester abroad option will be restricted to the third, fifth, or seventh semesters. During this period, students will be required to complete a minimum of 12 credits and can take up to a maximum of 26 credits at the host foreign institution, in accordance with the University Grants Commission Regulations, 2022.

The primary objective of the Semester Away Programme is to provide students with a wider academic and cultural perspective. By engaging with international faculty, diverse pedagogical methods, and multidisciplinary coursework, students are expected to gain valuable global insights. The programme also opens doors for participation in research projects, internships, and collaborative academic initiatives, enhancing both learning outcomes and employability.

Importantly, the university is also considering provisions for financial assistance to ensure inclusivity. Meritorious students from economically weaker backgrounds may receive support to participate in the programme, making global education opportunities more accessible.

If approved, the Semester Away Programme could significantly transform the undergraduate experience at Delhi University, bridging the gap between domestic education and global academic ecosystems. It reflects a growing emphasis on internationalisation in Indian higher education, preparing students to compete and collaborate in an increasingly interconnected world.

 

In a rapidly evolving global economy, education has emerged as a defining marker of national progress—not just in literacy, but in higher education attainment, research output, and innovation capacity. Over the past two decades, the expansion of tertiary education has transformed societies worldwide. According to UNESCO, global higher education enrolment surged from around 100 million in 2000 to over 200 million by 2014, reflecting an unprecedented demand for advanced skills and knowledge.

Today, the idea of an “educated country” goes beyond basic schooling. It includes the proportion of adults with college degrees, the strength of academic institutions, and the ability to align education with industry needs. Global benchmarks, including those by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, assess education levels among adults aged 25–64, offering insights into how nations are preparing their workforce for the future.

Topping the list is Canada, where approximately 63 per cent of adults hold tertiary qualifications. The country’s robust network of public universities, community colleges, and accessible financial aid systems has made higher education widely attainable.

Close behind is Ireland, with 58 per cent, reflecting its strategic investment in education aligned with economic sectors such as technology, pharmaceuticals, and finance. Japan and South Korea follow, with 57 per cent and 56 percent respectively, underscoring East Asia’s emphasis on science, engineering, and disciplined academic culture that fuels industrial innovation.

In Europe, the United Kingdom and Luxembourg each report 54 per cent of adults with higher education. While the UK benefits from globally renowned universities and a thriving international student market, Luxembourg leverages its highly mobile student population, many of whom study abroad and return with global expertise.

Australia (53 per cent) and Sweden (52 per cent) highlight the role of inclusive education policies and research-driven ecosystems. Australia’s global appeal as a study destination and Sweden’s emphasis on equity and sustainability-driven innovation have strengthened their educational standing.

The United States, with 51 per cent, remains a global leader in research and higher education diversity, housing many of the world’s top universities. Similarly, Israel, also at 51 per cent, exemplifies how education fuels innovation, earning its reputation as a “startup nation” with strengths in cybersecurity, biotechnology, and advanced engineering.

Notably, India does not feature in the top 10, despite its vast education system and growing number of graduates. While the country has made significant strides in expanding access to higher education, challenges remain in improving quality, research output, and overall attainment rates.

As nations compete in a knowledge-driven world, the rankings reflect a broader shift: education is no longer just a social good—it is a strategic asset shaping economic resilience, technological leadership, and global influence.

In a development highlighting the growing scrutiny around international academic collaborations, three leading institutions in Jammu and Kashmir have withdrawn from partnerships with a US-based non-profit, prompting the organisation to suspend its activities temporarily.

The Kashmir Care Foundation (KCF), which has been working with students in the region through mentorship programmes and academic initiatives, announced that it has paused all operations. “KCF has temporarily suspended all activities, including mentorship, expert sessions, and social wellness programmes,” the organisation said in a statement, adding that it will resume work once it secures the required approvals from relevant authorities.

The move follows the termination of Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) by three prominent universities: the University of Kashmir, the Islamic University of Science and Technology, and the Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. These partnerships were aimed at fostering collaboration in emerging technology fields and providing students with access to global expertise.

Officials from the University of Kashmir and IUST stated that a review by “competent authorities” concluded that continuing the MoUs was not in the “larger institutional interest.” SKUAST, however, has not publicly specified the reasons behind its decision.

The Kashmir Care Foundation, run by members of the Kashmiri diaspora in the United States, has been actively engaged in connecting students in the Valley with international mentors, hosting webinars, and facilitating knowledge exchange programmes. Its sudden suspension has raised questions about the future of similar cross-border academic collaborations in the region.

KCF president Altaf Lal expressed surprise at the developments, stating that the organisation had not been given a clear explanation for the cancellations. “I am as unaware about the development as anyone else,” he said, noting that responses have been submitted to the concerned universities and authorities.

The situation also briefly affected KCF’s digital presence, with its website going offline shortly after the MoU cancellations. It has since returned with a limited interface displaying the suspension notice.

For students, the impact is immediate. The pause in mentorship sessions and expert interactions removes a key channel of exposure to global academic and professional networks—an opportunity that had been particularly valuable in a region with limited international engagement.

This episode reflects a broader trend in global education, where international partnerships are increasingly subject to regulatory review and geopolitical considerations. As universities navigate compliance and institutional priorities, organisations like KCF find themselves at the intersection of education, policy, and diplomacy.

Whether these collaborations will resume remains uncertain, but the development underscores a shifting landscape—one where access to global knowledge networks is becoming as much a matter of governance as it is of education.

The Central Board of Secondary Education has introduced a revised assessment strategy for Class 10 students in West Asia after cancelling the remaining board examinations due to prevailing geopolitical conditions. Instead of conducting fresh exams, the board will declare results using a formula-based evaluation system designed to ensure fairness and continuity.

Under this alternative approach, students’ marks will be calculated based on the exams they have already completed. For those who appeared in all subjects, scores will reflect their actual performance. However, for students who missed certain papers, CBSE will apply an averaging method. For instance, students who appeared in four subjects will have their final scores derived from the average of their best three papers. Similarly, those who appeared in three subjects will be evaluated based on the average of their top two scores, while students who appeared in only two exams will receive results based on the average of those two subjects.

This structured formula aims to maintain consistency while accommodating the disruption faced by students across the region. It ensures that no student is unfairly disadvantaged due to circumstances beyond their control.

CBSE has also made special provisions for students with limited exam attempts. Candidates who appeared in only one or two subjects, including those from previous batches who registered for selective exams, will have their results prepared using available performance data. Additionally, such students will have the option to appear in the second board examination cycle introduced this year, giving them a chance to improve their scores.

For Class 12 students in West Asia, CBSE has released a clear schedule for marks submission under a similar alternative assessment framework. Schools are required to upload student data through an online portal between April 8 and April 17, 2026. The board has emphasized strict adherence to deadlines, noting that no corrections will be allowed once marks are submitted.

The evaluation process for Class 12 will rely on a combination of internal assessments and performance in exams conducted before February 28, wherever applicable. For subjects where exams could not be held, schools must submit student performance records from periodic assessments such as quarterly, half-yearly, and pre-board exams.

CBSE has issued detailed guidelines to ensure that the entire process remains accurate, transparent, and unbiased. Schools have been instructed to carefully follow all procedures while uploading marks, as any errors could directly impact students’ final results.

This alternative assessment policy was implemented after the board cancelled Class 12 examinations scheduled between March 16 and April 10, 2026, across several West Asian countries, including Bahrain, Iran, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

Through this revised system, CBSE aims to balance academic integrity with student welfare, ensuring that learners affected by the disruption can still receive fair and timely results without additional stress.

In a move that blends academic learning with real-world impact, students at Savitribai Phule Pune University (SPPU) are stepping beyond textbooks to help shape healthier cities. At the university’s department of health sciences, students have analysed global research to develop practical recommendations for policymakers focused on building more resilient and people-centric urban environments.

The initiative involved reviewing nearly 30 major studies from cities across Africa, the United States, and Europe. Drawing from these diverse case studies, students emphasised the need for long-term urban planning that prioritises community participation. Their findings suggest that healthier cities cannot be built through policy alone—citizens must be actively involved in decision-making processes.

The exercise gained momentum ahead of World Health Day (April 7), observed this year under the theme “Together for Health, Stand for Science.” Experts at SPPU highlighted that urban health is not just about healthcare systems, but also about how cities are designed and how people interact with their surroundings.

According to Dr Girish Tillu, Assistant Professor at the department, the course encourages experiential learning. Students are exposed to real-life urban challenges, including infrastructure gaps, pollution, overcrowding, and transport issues—factors collectively known as the determinants of urban health. The course, introduced six years ago, focuses on understanding how rapid urbanisation directly impacts public health outcomes.

One of the key insights from the study was the importance of adapting global innovations to local contexts. For instance, students examined policies like the sugar tax implemented in parts of Africa to reduce consumption of sugary beverages among children. They explored how similar approaches could be tailored to cities like Pune.

Faculty members also stressed that public health solutions must move beyond top-down governance. “People should not remain passive recipients,” the study noted, advocating for stronger citizen engagement in shaping policies that affect their daily lives.

Dr Abhay Kudale, head of the department, described the initiative as a practical implementation of the National Education Policy 2020, which promotes interdisciplinary and applied learning. By equipping students with real-world insights, SPPU aims to nurture future public health professionals capable of addressing challenges from local to global scales.

As cities continue to expand, such classroom-led initiatives may play a crucial role in bridging the gap between research and policy—ensuring that healthier urban futures are not just imagined, but actively designed.

More Articles ...