Opinion

RV University Bangalore is one of the leading private universities known for its innovative and industry-relevant courses. If you are planning your higher education and wondering which course to choose at RV University Bangalore, here are the top 5 courses that are in high demand and promise excellent career prospects. 

B.Tech (Hons) Computer Science and Engineering (AI & ML).

RV University Bangalore offers  B.Tech (Hons) programme specialising in Computer Science with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. This course equips students with future tech jobs by learning the newest AI skills and real-world programming. As the demand of AI specialists in India is increasing, the course is a perfect option.

Bachelors of Business Administration (Hons) with Specialisations.

The BBA (Hons) at RV University Bangalore comes with impactful specialisations like Digital Marketing, Data Science, and Analytics, and Professional Accountancy certifications. The course provides a great selection to students intending to become leaders in businesses since it enhances managerial skills and industry-readiness.

B.Sc. (Hons) Data Science

RV University Bangalore’s B.Sc. (Hons) in Data Science trains students in data analysis, statistical methods, and machine learning. As the demand for data specialists in finance, IT, and healthcare remains in the sky, this course presents a solid foundation to career opportunities of enthusiastic professionals.

B.Des (Hons) of User Experience (UX) design.

Creative minds can explore the B.Des (Hons) in User Experience Design at RV University Bangalore, which focuses on designing user-friendly digital products. The sphere of UX design is rapidly developing since customer-centred product design gains more significance in companies.

MBA of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science.

For postgraduate aspirants, the MBA programme in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science at RV University Bangalore combines management skills with knowledge of AI and analytics. This course is an excellent fit to those who would like to work in technologies based businesses as leaders.

Why Choose RV University Bangalore?

RV University Bangalore stands out with its industry-aligned curriculum, faculty expertise, and excellent infrastructure. The courses are structured in a manner that they help develop technical as well as soft skills that equip a student to compete in a competitive job market. RV University Bangalore also offers opportunities for internships and industry collaborations, helping students gain real-world experience.

If you want to pursue quality education and lucrative careers, RV University Bangalore’s top courses like B.Tech (Hons) in AI & ML, BBA (Hons), B.Sc. Data Science, B.Des UX Design, and MBA in AI & Data Science are great options to consider. These classes guarantee an ideal combination of information, capabilities, and market applicability.

To know more about these courses, visit RV University Bangalore’s official website or connect with us for free consultation.

The burning of the Chancellor’s car, the vandalised buildings, and the looted sports lab at VIT Bhopal have shocked India’s higher education community. The visuals of destruction triggered panic among parents, fear among faculty, and a nationwide debate about campus discipline. Violence, under any circumstance, is unjustifiable. If students begin taking the law into their own hands, it risks becoming a dangerous blueprint for future unrest in Indian universities.

But to view this as a case of mere “student misbehaviour” is to overlook a deeper, long-boiling crisis. What unfolded on the VIT campus was not a sudden eruption—it was the consequence of long-standing infrastructural neglect, administrative misjudgment, and cumulative student frustration that had been building for years.

Chronic Water Shortage: A Crisis That Returned Every Summer

The centre of the anger lies in VIT Bhopal’s recurring water scarcity, a problem students say has existed since the campus opened. The institute houses nearly 15,000 students and more than 1,000 staff members in Sehore, one of Madhya Pradesh’s most water-scarce regions. Procuring sufficient water tankers—despite high expenditure—has become increasingly difficult.

“When we were in first year, the management abruptly declared a two-month holiday during May–June,” said a third-year B.Tech student. “We later learned the real reason—they couldn’t handle so many students because of the water crisis. There are only two canteens for thousands of us, the food is overpriced, and hostel fees are collected even when facilities are inadequate.”

For years, the crisis remained under control because admissions were low and most hostels stayed empty during COVID. But after 2023, with admissions rising sharply due to the AI boom and full-strength occupancy returning, the system collapsed. During the May–June 2024 heatwave, water shortage reached its peak. The administration underestimated the severity, triggering protests and eventually postponing exams as students were sent home.

A second-year Architecture student described the infrastructural mismatch:
“Our entire building has glass walls. Imagine attending classes in that heat. Air conditioning came only last year. Either there was no long-term planning—or they didn’t expect so many students to join.”

Compressed Semesters and Cut-Down Recreation Built Silent Pressure

Alongside infrastructure stress, students faced tightening academic pressure. Internal documents and student testimonies show that VIT Bhopal shortened semesters, increased attendance requirements, and drastically reduced sports, cultural events, and recreation slots.

“Every six months, we have nearly three semesters,” said a first-year student living outside the campus. “There’s burnout everywhere. Last rainy season, some students went to a dam to relax and lost their lives. If campus life had recreation, maybe they wouldn’t have gone.”

Students connected frequent illnesses—including a widely reported jaundice wave—not just to hygiene issues but to:

• irregular rest
  
  
• compressed routines
  
  
• inadequate recreation
  
  
• mental and academic exhaustion
  
  The cumulative effect was a campus running on pressure without pause.

The Spark: A Warden–Student Incident

In this fragile environment, an alleged incident in which a hostel warden reportedly hit a student became the immediate flashpoint. What might elsewhere have been a disciplinary inquiry escalated within hours, leading to mass gatherings, chaos, and eventually unprecedented vandalism.

The university has now initiated inquiries into both the misconduct allegation and property damage. Faculty have expressed concerns over safety, while parents are demanding transparent protocols and improved communication.

The Real Problem: A System That Ignored Warning Signs

VIT Bhopal’s crisis highlights a broader issue in India’s rapidly expanding private higher education sector: growth without proportional infrastructure, student services, mental-health support, or grievance redressal.

The campus expanded admissions aggressively—especially during the post-AI boom—without:

• upgrading water and housing infrastructure
  
  
• strengthening recreational and mental-health resources
  
  
• improving student grievance systems
  
  
• ensuring academic schedules matched student well-being
  

Instead, the administration pushed discipline over dialogue. Students pushed frustration over patience. The result was a complete breakdown of trust.

Accountability on Both Sides

While the violence must be condemned unequivocally, the conditions that led to it cannot be ignored. A harmonious learning environment requires:

For the Institute:

• immediate infrastructure audits
  
  
• long-term water management plans
  
  
• restoration of sports and recreation
  
  
• transparent grievance systems
  
  
• clear codes of conduct communicated openly
  
  

For Students:

• recognition that violence has consequences
  
  
• responsible channeling of concerns
  
  
• participation in dialogue, not destruction
  
  

For Parents and Faculty:

• stronger engagement
  
  
• participation in safety and welfare committees
  
  
• bridging communication gaps
  
  

The Question Now

Can VIT Bhopal address the fundamental issues that led to this upheaval—before the campus becomes known more for unrest than academic excellence?

The incident is a warning not just for one institution but for India’s higher education system: when infrastructure, well-being, and communication fail, frustration fills the gap. And if left unaddressed, frustration finds its own explosive outlet.

VIT must act—early, decisively, and transparently—because the real danger is not the violence itself, but the ecosystem that made it feel inevitable.

Aspiring lawyers dreaming of studying in India's top tier-1 cities like Delhi NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, and Chennai are on the right path. Often students from small towns and villages feel insecure  about moving to bigger cities for higher education but taking admission in premier universities offering BA LLB, BBA LLB, BCom LLB, LLB, and LLM programs with world-class facilities and industry exposure is always better. If your google search history looks like "best law universities Delhi NCR Mumbai Bangalore," or "law admissions 2026 via AICLET," this guide spotlights the top 7 strictly in these metro cities that are perfect for building a strong legal career.

1. The Northcap University (School of Law), Gurugram (Delhi NCR)

Location: Gurugram, Haryana (Tier-1 Delhi NCR)
Offers BA LLB (Hons) and LLM via AICLET. Known for advanced moot courts, corporate law focus, and placements up to INR 10 lakhs average package. Fees: ~INR 3.3 lakhs/year.

2. Sushant University (School of Law), Gurugram (Delhi NCR)

Location: Gurugram, Haryana (Tier-1 Delhi NCR)
AICLET-accepting BA LLB (Hons) with research emphasis. Total fees ~INR 8.99 lakhs. Benefits from proximity to Delhi High Court and top law firms.

3. Amity University, Gurgaon (Manesar) (Delhi NCR)

Location: Gurgaon (Manesar), Haryana (Tier-1 Delhi NCR)
Provides integrated law programs through AICLET. Strong in international law; average package INR 8 lakhs. Modern campus with global collaborations.

4. BITS Law School, Mumbai

Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra (Tier-1)
Premier AICLET partner offering BA LLB and BBA LLB. Ideal for finance/corporate law careers in India's commercial capital. Excellent alumni network.

5. ISME Law College, Bangalore

Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka (Tier-1)
Offers BBA LLB via AICLET with tech-law specialization. Leverages Bangalore's startup ecosystem for internships and placements (~INR 6-8 lakhs).

6. Vidyashilp University, Bengaluru

Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka (Tier-1)
AICLET-based BA LLB (Hons). Fees ~INR 25 lakhs total. Renowned for innovative curriculum, IP law focus, and strong industry ties.​

7. Vinayak Mission’s Law School, Chennai

Location: Chennai, Tamil Nadu (Tier-1)
Accepts AICLET for BCom LLB (Hons) at ~INR 10 lakhs. Specializes in commercial law; benefits from Chennai's industrial and legal hub status.

Why Tier-1 Law Colleges Are Best Choice?

• Prime Access: Close to High Courts, Supreme Court (Delhi NCR), corporate HQs (Mumbai/Bangalore), and legal firms.
• Top Infrastructure: Smart classrooms, legal aid clinics, international moot courts.
• Placements: Average INR 6-12 LPA from Khaitan & Co., Trilegal, and corporates.
• Better Environment: Get much-needed exposure and grow while learning. 

Choosing a top AICLET-accepting law university in tier-1 cities like Delhi NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, and Chennai gives you many advantages like proximity to Supreme Court and High Courts, top law firms, corporate headquarters, and vibrant legal ecosystems that boost internships, moots, and placements (average INR 6-12 LPA). These 7 premier institutions offer modern facilities, industry-focused curricula, and merit-based admissions through a single AICLET score, making your law career launch seamless and strategic. Use this list and make an informed decision. Best of Luck!

Bihar’s latest scientific alarm did not come from a hospital ward or a medical audit. It came from inside the most sacred space in public health — a mother’s breastmilk. A new study published in Scientific Reports has found uranium in 100% of breastmilk samples collected from six districts in Bihar. As a health journalist, I see this not merely as a research finding but as a stark reminder of how India’s environmental neglect is now seeping into the first food an infant consumes.

This is not a fringe issue. It is a public health emergency.

When the First Food Becomes the First Risk

The researchers collected samples from 40 lactating mothers across Bhojpur, Samastipur, Begusarai, Khagaria, Katihar and Nalanda. Uranium was detected in every single sample — a sentence no public health official should ever have to read.

Khagaria recorded the highest average contamination, while Katihar showed the single highest spike of 5.25 μg/L. While these numbers are below international limits, they signal a disturbing truth: if uranium is reaching breastmilk, it is already flowing freely in the environment.

For infants — whose kidneys, brains, and bodies are still fragile — even “low” exposure carries weight. The study’s risk model shows 70% of infants face non-cancer health risks if such exposure continues. And that should worry us far more than the radiation headlines that will follow. Uranium’s chemical toxicity, particularly to developing kidneys, is the real danger here.

The Mothers Are Not the Problem — the Environment Is

Before panic spreads, the study makes one thing clear: breastfeeding must continue. Stopping it would do more harm than good. As Dr. Ashok Sharma of AIIMS Delhi clarifies, most uranium is excreted through urine, not breastmilk, and levels found are far below WHO’s thresholds.

The real problem lies beneath the ground.

Bihar’s groundwater — the lifeline for drinking and farming — has long been known to be contaminated with heavy metals. Earlier studies by the same research groups recorded uranium levels as high as 82 μg/L in Supaul and 77 μg/L in Nalanda, far above the WHO limit of 30 μg/L for drinking water.

This is where the outrage must be directed. Not at mothers. Not at breastfeeding. But at:

• unchecked groundwater extraction,
• uranium-rich geological formations,
• phosphate fertilisers,
• industrial and wastewater mismanagement.

Breastmilk is only the final mirror reflecting decades of environmental apathy.

Where Is the Public Health Response?

We need to ask hard questions. Why did it take a small research team to detect what district authorities should have caught years ago? Why is India lacking systematic biomonitoring of heavy metals in vulnerable regions? And why must Bihar repeatedly bear the brunt of environmental poisoning — arsenic yesterday, uranium today, and who knows what tomorrow?

Scientists are now calling for:

• Statewide water testing
• Biomonitoring in pregnant and lactating women
• Public advisories
• Access to safe water and filtration systems

These are not ambitious demands. These are basic duties.

Infants Shouldn’t Be the Ones Paying the Price

The heartbreaking truth behind this study is that infants — who cannot choose their water, their environment, or their protection — are the first to suffer. We often speak of India’s demographic dividend. But how can we talk about future human capital when environmental toxins are entering children's bodies before they even learn to crawl?

Bihar’s breastmilk-uranium findings are not just data points. They are warnings. Warnings that India must stop treating environmental health as an afterthought. Warnings that poor states with high groundwater dependence are carrying invisible toxic burdens. And warnings that the earliest moments of life — meant to be protected — are already compromised.

Breastfeeding must continue. But so must our demand for accountability.

If uranium has reached breastmilk, the crisis has already crossed the threshold of private concern. It is now a public responsibility.

And we should not wait for the next study to tell us what we already know:

India’s environmental neglect is poisoning its future citizens — one drop at a time.

If four children across India die by suicide within weeks—each after months of bullying, humiliation, and ignored pleas for help—then the question is no longer what went wrong in their schools. The question is: where are we going wrong as a society?

We are failing because we treat children’s suffering as exaggeration. We are failing because we glorify “toughness” and dismiss vulnerability. We are failing because we still believe discipline is built through fear, and authority is beyond question—even when the accused are teachers. A society that forces a nine-year-old to beg for help five times in one morning, only to be told to “adjust,” is a society that has lost its moral compass.

We are going wrong because we built schools to chase marks, not to raise emotionally resilient human beings. Because we invested in smart classrooms, but not a single trained counsellor. Because we created systems where a child can write a five-page suicide note describing torture, and adults still ask, “Was it really that serious?” We are going wrong because parents are pressured to stay silent, teachers are rarely held accountable, and institutions are more worried about reputation than saving a child in distress.

We are going wrong because we refuse to teach empathy—as though it is optional. Because we normalise bullying as “kids being kids.” Because we forget that children carry the weight of our cultural indifference on their tiny shoulders until they break.

Where are we going wrong?
Everywhere a child asks for help and is ignored.
Everywhere adults choose authority over compassion.
Everywhere trauma is mislabelled as mischief.
Everywhere silence is easier than intervention.

These four deaths are not isolated tragedies. They are a mirror showing us who we have become—and it is not a society that protects its children. Unless this country urgently rebuilds its entire approach to school culture, mental health, and accountability, we will keep losing more young lives to the toxicity we refuse to confront.

The real crisis is not inside classrooms alone.
It is inside us.

LinkedIn likes to position itself as the world’s “professional meritocracy.”
But this week, women across the platform proved something alarming: merit alone does not guarantee visibility, masculinity does.

In a bold social experiment, women professionals changed their gender to “male” on LinkedIn. What happened next was not a coincidence. It was evidence.

Engagement skyrocketed.
Comments multiplied.
Reach exploded overnight.

If anyone ever doubted gender bias on LinkedIn or the existence of algorithmic discrimination, this experiment has turned suspicion into measurable proof. The platform’s algorithm appears far more eager to amplify male-coded profiles than female ones.

But while the evidence is powerful, the method raises serious concerns.

Are Women Proving Bias—or Training the Algorithm to Ignore Them?

Let’s be honest: this trend is painful. Women already battle systemic barriers in workplaces, leadership roles, and online spaces. Now, even digital platforms—supposedly neutral—seem to reward women only when they pretend not to be women.

And here’s the chilling part:
If women keep adopting masculine markers for visibility, they may be reinforcing the very algorithmic bias they’re trying to expose.

By presenting themselves as “male,” women risk:

signalling that feminine communication lacks value
diluting the diversity LinkedIn should amplify
normalising the idea that women must adapt to digital inequality
losing the authentic tone, empathy, and nuance that define their voice

This is not a harmless experiment. It’s a wake-up call.

Women Respond: “I’m Not Changing My Gender to Please an Algorithm.”

Journalist Shamita Iyer asks the most critical question:
“What is the aim? To force LinkedIn to change—or to spark a viral trend women feel pressured to join?”
She refuses to edit her identity for reach:
“I’m keeping my voice, tone, and gender. I like them,whether the algorithm does or not.”

Dr. Prachi Thakur echoes the sentiment:
“I will not change my gender whatsoever. That would mean reinforcing the algorithm.”

Their stance reflects what many women professionals feel: visibility shouldn’t require self-erasure.

There Is a Better Strategy: Women Amplifying Women

Rachael, whose post triggered this debate, offers a solution rooted in solidarity rather than distortion:
“Find ten women’s posts every day, follow, engage, amplify.”

This is not gaming the system.
This is reshaping it.

Imagine thousands boosting women’s voices daily. LinkedIn’s algorithm will have no choice but to evolve.

LinkedIn Must Answer for This

The burden cannot fall entirely on women.
It is time for LinkedIn to confront this gendered visibility gap and address its algorithmic bias against women.

Because women should not have to become men to be heard.

The future of digital equality depends on platforms that recognise authentic voices, not masculine defaults.