Ramdev has spoken for years on health and healing, yoga and our culture, on stress and spirituality. Building the nation has remained a thread running through his discourses over the years. In an exclusive interaction with author Akshat Gupta for The Times of India, yoga guru Baba Ramdev discusses why it’s time to reboot India’s education system. The interview which begins on a lighter note – with Baba ji being asked what law he’d enforce if he were the Health Minister for a day – soon segues into a serious discussion about how our education system has let us down, why gurukuls don’t exist anymore, and how he envisions a “global gurukul” going forward. Watch and hear him loudly, boldly lay out his vision: because when you change the way a nation learns, you change the way that nation thinks.

Who is Baba Ramdev and why does his view matter?

Baba Ramdev rose to fame through televised yoga sessions in the early 2000s. He later co-founded Patanjali Ayurved, building one of India’s largest homegrown FMCG brands. For many, he represents a blend of yoga, Ayurveda and cultural pride. For others, he is a controversial public figure who speaks strongly on politics and policy.

That is why his views on education attract attention. He does not speak as a policy expert. He speaks as someone who believes education defines character, confidence and national identity.

During the interview, he calls himself a “Universal Health Minister,” a phrase that reflects how he sees his role, not limited by office, but driven by influence.

The Gurukul argument: Loss or transition?

One of the central themes of the interview is the disappearance of the traditional gurukul system. Ramdev claims that India once had lakhs of gurukuls, where education was not limited to literacy but focused on wisdom and character.

He argues that colonial policies, especially those introduced in 1835 under British rule, changed India’s education model. Historians do confirm that in 1835, Thomas Babington Macaulay introduced reforms that promoted English education in India. Ramdev views this shift as the beginning of “mental slavery,” a phrase he uses to describe dependency on Western frameworks.

His concern is not just about language. It is about mindset. He believes education should build self-respect, not imitation.

Yet this raises a question: was the old system entirely ideal, or has modern education also brought access and scientific progress? The answer likely lies somewhere in between. India’s current literacy rate stands above 77 percent, according to recent government data. Access to education has expanded dramatically in the last century. But debates around quality and cultural relevance remain active.

Ramdev repeatedly says that education must combine two elements. First, awareness of one’s roots. Second, connection with the modern world.

He does not reject science or innovation. In fact, he stresses that knowledge, research and invention are essential. He points to countries like Israel, Japan and South Korea as examples of nations that built global influence through education despite smaller populations.

His message is simple: population size does not create power. Education does.

He also makes a strong distinction between being a consumer and being a creator. According to him, education should produce innovators, not just employees. It should remove fear and inferiority, not create competition-driven anxiety.

The idea of a “Global Gurukul”

Perhaps the boldest part of the conversation is his vision of a global education board under Patanjali. He speaks about a future where students from 200 countries come to study in India.

He imagines a system where ancient Indian philosophy sits alongside modern science. Where agriculture, entrepreneurship and public speaking are taught along with textbooks. Where discipline and character are part of the curriculum.

He insists that such education would reduce depression, addiction and moral confusion among youth. That is a powerful claim. It also invites scrutiny. Education alone cannot solve every social problem, but it can shape resilience and clarity of thought.

The idea of a “global gurukul” reflects a larger national conversation. India’s National Education Policy 2020 also speaks about holistic and multidisciplinary learning. The difference lies in interpretation and execution.

“Vishwa Guru”: Vision or rhetoric?

The phrase “India as Vishwa Guru” appears again in this discussion. Ramdev connects it to education rooted in pride, ethics and knowledge.

He argues that political slogans alone cannot build greatness. Social media noise cannot replace substance. Only a strong education system can create confident citizens.

At one point, he says education should not create aggression or blind pride. Instead, it should remove darkness and build inner strength. That statement stands out. It shifts the focus from dominance to development.

Becoming a global leader in education would require measurable outcomes, research output, global university rankings, innovation patents, and inclusive access. Cultural confidence must walk alongside scientific credibility.

Two student deaths in the span of days — one in Rajasthan and the other in Madhya Pradesh — have cast an uncomfortable spotlight on a question India’s education system has long postponed: how prepared are schools to detect and respond to silent health vulnerabilities among children?

Back on February 23, little Divya, just nine years old, fell unconscious while playing one morning. She was in fifth grade at a private school in Rajasthan's Nagaur district. By the time she reached a nearby government hospital, doctors could not revive her. They said she had already passed away. Some think it might have been a heart problem, though official medical reports are still pending.

Later that week, inside an exam hall in Moreana's district town, tenth grader Varsha Kushwah collapsed midway through her math test. The girl never regained consciousness. Local administration confirmed she passed away shortly after. Medical staff reviewing her condition said extreme lack of nutrition played a role. Severe anaemia was also noted by health workers on site. While autopsy findings are still pending, heart related issues remain one possible factor mentioned by physicians.

One event happened when classes were running normally. The second struck while students faced exam stress. Still, when lined up, both point to something bigger beneath. A weak safety net shows through. Young bodies are struggling more than noticed. Schools lack checks that catch problems early. Emergency plans often do not exist where kids spend most of their days.

Anaemia in Schoolchildren

Though hidden, tiredness might point to deeper issues. Across many parts of India, over fifty out of every hundred teenage girls face low blood count, records show. This isnt rare among females fifteen to nineteen, numbers climb past halfway mark again and again. When levels drop too far, everyday life gets heavier: dizziness creeps in, thinking slows down, hearts work harder just to keep up.

Still, checking blood levels regularly does not happen the same way in every school. While national efforts like RBSK require child health screenings until age eighteen, real world results show gaps, staff within education departments admit to follow, though it varies. In smaller towns or countryside areas, private institutions sometimes fall beyond the reach of standard health monitoring systems.

Emergency Response: A Missing Protocol?

Equally troubling is the question of preparedness. Do schools maintain updated medical histories of students? Are teachers trained in basic life support (BLS)? Is there access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) on campuses? In most districts, the answer remains uncertain.

Cardiac arrest in children is rare, but paediatric cardiologists note that undiagnosed congenital heart conditions, electrolyte imbalances, dehydration, and extreme stress can act as triggers. Examination stress, particularly during Board assessments, is an additional physiological load — one rarely factored into school health policy.

Education Beyond Academics

A quarter billion kids go to school across India. Still, their well- being sits on the edges, showing up now and then in shots or meals, not woven into steady check ups.

Away from headlines, what happened in Nagaur and Morena speaks louder than sorrow. These moments reveal cracks that yearly check ups could help mend. Picture school halls where food quality gets reviewed like test scores. Health isn't just weight or mood, it shows up in daily attendance, in energy levels, in how kids respond under stress. When systems log emotional well, being alongside height and vision, patterns emerge. Emergencies? They wait for no policy meeting. Every campus, state, run or privately managed, should have plans ready before trouble knocks.

Should schools truly support education, they need to start by supporting life within their walls.

For decades, Indian students chose international universities based on prestige, global rankings, and brand recall. Today, that logic is shifting. The new determinant of higher education mobility is not aspiration alone — it is trade architecture.

As India advances negotiations on a Comprehensive Economic Partnership with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and prepares for deeper engagement under the proposed India–European Union Free Trade Agreement, higher education is becoming embedded within economic diplomacy. Trade corridors are no longer just about goods and services; they are about skills, credentials, and labour mobility.

Between 2018 and 2023, India’s trade with the European Union crossed USD 180 billion annually, while trade with GCC nations exceeded USD 240 billion. A substantial share of this exchange flows through professional services — engineering, healthcare, digital technologies, logistics, and finance. Students are observing this shift carefully. Enrollment growth is increasingly stronger in trade-aligned regions than in legacy destinations that lack structured economic integration with India.

One of the most consequential developments is the push for mutual recognition of qualifications. Within the EU, harmonised credential frameworks have enabled cross-border tertiary enrollment to grow by over 30% between 2013 and 2021. Regulatory convergence reduces what students fear most: credential risk. When degrees travel seamlessly across borders, employability becomes predictable. If India–EU negotiations institutionalise professional mobility frameworks, Indian graduates will face fewer regulatory bottlenecks abroad.

Labour market data reinforces this transition. More than 60% of globally mobile students now prioritise post-study work rights and credential portability over institutional rank. The EU and GCC together account for roughly 38% of India’s skilled migration flows — a figure that has remained structurally stable over the past decade. Stability matters. Predictable regulatory systems allow families to make long-term financial commitments with greater confidence.

The GCC presents a parallel but distinct story. Since 2010, GCC governments have invested over $100 billion in higher education infrastructure aligned to economic diversification — renewable energy, tourism, fintech, logistics, healthcare. Indian enrollments in GCC institutions have grown at 12–15% annually, significantly outpacing the global outbound growth average of under 7%. This is not coincidence; it is policy design meeting workforce demand.

Program-level data reveals concentration in applied fields — data analytics, sustainability engineering, health administration, supply chain management, fintech. These are disciplines directly linked to globally regulated industries operating within trade-aligned ecosystems.

Cost optimisation also plays a decisive role. Applied master’s programs across parts of Europe are often 30–45% less expensive than comparable North American degrees, with clearer wage convergence and structured post-study pathways. GCC destinations add shorter program cycles and high regional job absorption in infrastructure and services sectors.

Universities are responding. Institutions embedded within trade-integrated economies are redesigning curricula around cross-border employability metrics, industry co-design, and work-integrated learning. Graduate outcome data increasingly shows faster labour market entry in such ecosystems.

The shift underway is structural, not cyclical. Education choices are moving from prestige signaling to trade-aligned career signaling. In a world shaped by economic blocs and mobility agreements, higher education decisions are becoming instruments of strategic workforce planning.

The future of international education will not be decided solely by rankings. It will be shaped by trade treaties.

Hundreds of thousands of Indian students ask the same question every year after Class 12: What is the future-proof, respected and meaningful career? The talk is about medicine and engineering, but hiddenly and gradually Forensic Science is rapidly becoming one of the top jobs that students of science pursue in their search.

This is the plain truth, forensic science is not a no-go profession but, in the hands of the right student, forensic science today can be one of the most rewarding careers in India.

Why the sudden interest?

Crime has changed. It is no longer as simple as fingerprints and blood samples. There is an increase in cyber fraud, digital frauds, narcotics, financial crimes and DNA based investigations. This has compelled investigation agencies and courts to be more dependent on scientific evidence. Central Forensic Science Laboratory and state forensic labs, as well as private labs and cybersecurity companies, are increasing, and they are staffing with trained professionals. Students are interested and they see this change.

What everybody does not tell you.

The crime shows tend to glamorise forensic science. As a matter of fact, it requires extensive scientific knowledge, patience, precision, and emotional stamina. It might be tedious, heavily controlled and full of details. Findings have to be subject to examination in court, occasionally years following the examination.

This is what however makes the career so powerful.

Forensic science is compensated on competence as opposed to college credentials, unlike most saturated professions. The right forensic professional who possesses a good lab or analytical or cyber capability can develop a good career even without the IIT or AIIMS tag.

Career scope after Class 12

Students are permitted to take BSc in Forensic science after PCB or PCM in Class 12 with MSc and specialised certifications. Fields of career are forensic biology, toxicology, examining questioned documents, cyber forensics, DNA analysis and crime scene investigation.

Graduates can work with:

  • Government forensic labs
  • Police departments
  • Intelligence and investigation departments.
  • Cybersecurity firms
  • The private forensic consultancies.
  • Schools and institutions

Experts can also become expert witnesses in court as a profession that carries much professional respect.

The balance between salary and satisfaction is real.

It may not be flashy on entry level salaries as compared to IT jobs. Nevertheless, Forensic science is something that many professions do not provide: longevity and sustainability. With the current modernization of legal systems and the growth of evidence-based policing, experienced professionals experience consistent growth, promotions, and increases in pay based on specialisation.

What is more important is that your work can create justice itself, assist in convicting guilty people and in protecting innocent people.

How to  Know  If Forensic Science is The Right Career?

Forensic science is not a job that everyone prefers. However, being a Class 12 student who:

  • Adores science more than books.
  • Reflects rationally and perseveringly.
  • Desires a profession of actual social influence.
  • Is willing to keep learning

Then yes, forensic science It is worth it in India

With students today rushing to follow the trends, forensic science rewards individuals who prefer to be deep rather than shallow. And that, in the modern day career world, is a strong strength.

So, think, decide, and choose wisely. For more details or free career consultation, connect with us at 08035018480. 

When Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Union Budget 2026-27, education was no longer framed as a social sector expense — it was positioned as economic infrastructure. With ₹1,39,285.95 crore allocated to the Ministry of Education, up 8.27% from last year, the message is clear: classrooms are now labour-market factories.

The most significant proposal is a high-powered committee tasked with aligning degrees to jobs and enterprises. India has long faced a paradox — millions of graduates but employers complaining of unemployable talent. Linking curricula to AI, services exports, and entrepreneurship could finally close that gap. If executed well, this may become the most important reform since the National Education Policy 2020.

But policy intent alone won’t fix structural inertia. Universities historically update syllabi slower than industries evolve. Without industry-embedded faculty, apprenticeship mandates and outcome-based funding, the committee risks becoming another advisory body producing reports instead of results.

The plan to build five university townships near industrial corridors is more promising. Education ecosystems succeed when learning, living and working coexist — much like global innovation clusters. If India truly integrates housing, skill hubs and companies, graduates may finally stop migrating solely to metros.

Equally transformative is the proposal of a girls’ STEM hostel in every district. Female participation in science drops sharply after school due to safety, mobility and accommodation barriers. This single intervention could quietly reshape India’s research workforce over a decade.

However, the reforms reveal a deeper shift: education is being woven into tourism, healthcare and technology economies. Medical hubs, upgraded astronomy facilities and professional tourist guide training suggest India wants knowledge industries — not just IT services — to drive GDP.

The reduction of TCS on overseas education remittances from 5% to 2% acknowledges a reality policymakers once avoided: students going abroad are not a “brain drain” but part of a global talent network.

Budget 2026 doesn’t merely fund education — it redefines its purpose. The real test now isn’t allocation, but execution. Because in India, reforms don’t fail on vision. They fail in classrooms.

Education is much more than words and facts; it involves raising awareness and consciousness. Knowledge which is only read and not manifested in one's actions is no longer knowledge, it is turned into mere information. Human growth is influenced less by reading and more by experiencing. The major gist here is encapsulated in the saying: First practise, then teach. This is not a touchy, feely chant, but a natural, scientific, and philosophical method of learning.

Once education takes this direction, it ceases to be about exams only and becomes a way of living.

The human brain is ready to learn from birth. The child first looks, listens, feels, falls down, and then gets up again. No one learns to walk by merely reading a book; balance is obtained through endless tries.

Modern neuroscience also shows that learning from direct experience establishes stronger and more lasting brain connections. On the other hand, learning material by heart or only hearing it tends to be stored in the short term memory only.

Education, at a more profound level, is an awakening to the self. Knowledge should not only help understand the world outside but also enable one to find oneself.

A school that does not teach students how to be inquisitive simply loads them with answers. When a learner struggles with a problem, fails in an experiment, and tries again, they are not just learning a subject—they are developing patience, discernment, and self-discipline. This is the true aim of education: inner maturity.

Study gains greater significance after experience because books then connect with life. When a student has lived through a situation or experiment, every line in a textbook becomes meaningful. Words turn into interpretations of experience. That is why knowledge first practised lends depth and permanence to theories learned later.

There is no doubt about it now that each student is different. Some students may love science, while others may be interested in art, society or nature. When education ignores these differences, it is like denying personal uniqueness. Learning based on experience does not put students in a single mould; rather, it helps them discover their hidden talents.

This way, education emotionally resonates with the learners instead of merely speaking at them. If learning is only about getting good marks and passing exams then students will be under so much pressure and anxiety. On the other hand, if learning is a process of discovery, experimentation, and dialogue students' confidence will gain a rise naturally. They will not be afraid of mistakes as they will be aware that the latter are an essential part of learning already. Education of this kind strengthens the inside of a person and does not make them compete in an unhealthy manner.

A teacher too, in this case, changes his/her role. A teacher, nowadays, apart from informing the learners, is a fellow learner and shares the path with the students. Gradually, the teacher stops giving the ready, made answers and starts encouraging the students to ask questions; he/she moves from giving orders to guiding.

Teachers who become learners themselves can turn the classroom into a living space of curiosity instead of fear, dialogue instead of silence.

In education, there is a need for a combination of science, philosophy, and experience. Science by itself leads to learning becoming a mere matter of mechanics; philosophy by itself may cause it to be disconnected from practice; emotion by itself can make it unstable. Experience is a means of uniting all three and thus making education holistic. Such education results in individuals who have the ability to think clearly, have sensitive feelings and behave responsibly.

One who is merely a storehouse of information can be clever, but not wise. Wisdom is the result of knowledge that has been tried and tested in real life. Experience teaches one the boundaries, failure brings humility, and success maintains restraint. This balance prevents both self-centredness and loss of individuality in the crowd.

Ultimately, education cannot be confined to employment alone. Livelihood matters, but the final goal of education is the development of vision—a vision that distinguishes right from wrong, looks beyond short-term gains to long-term consequences, and sees knowledge not as power, but as service.

“First practise, then teach” captures this very vision. When experience becomes the seed and study its expansion, education makes individuals not only skilled, but also discerning. This is the true nature of education—emerging from life, flowing back into life, and giving life its meaning.

Every Union Budget cycle revives a familiar argument: is India spending enough on education? Usually, the debate is boiled down to just one headline numberthe Ministry of Education's allocationsingle, handedly seen as the measure of national intent. However, such a narrow presentation ignores the core fact. Education outcomes depend not on the budget of a single ministry but on the overall public ecosystem's robustness and consistency.

The ability of a child to learn is not only inside the four walls of the classroom. It is influenced by nutrition, health, and sanitation, but also by transport, housing stability, digital access, and family income security. If any of these supporting systems get weak enough, it won't be enough for even the most cleverly designed education policies to make a big difference. In fact, education is the place where the flaws of different policies meet and get hidden from the eyes of the public.

Public facilities, such as schools, colleges, libraries, hostels, and laboratories, also have a social responsibility that they share. Government funding alone will never be enough to keep the quality high if the local people continue to see public infrastructure as something they can spend without thinking. It is a fact that when citizens care for their community, school property is protected, teachers are valued, and local institutions are involved, the public education systems last longer and work better. On the other hand, neglect and indifferent attitude result in the deterioration of even the best, funded facilities thus, the infrastructure turns into an empty shell.

This mutual dependence is most apparent in school education. While education departments are responsible for midday meal programs, the success of such programs cannot be separated from issues like food security, supply chains, and public health systems. In case nutrition budgets are cut or health services decline, attendance will fall and learning will be affected especially those first generation learners. Similarly, foundational literacy initiatives are also linked to early childhood care, anganwadi facilities, and maternal health, which are all beyond the direct control of the education ministry.

The higher education sector has a more profound and philosophical problem. Most of the time, universities are evaluated almost solely based on placement records and salary packages, which is why education is narrowly seen as a means to making money. This banalization of education as a mere employability tool is tantamount to neglecting the broader educational goals of innovation, social impact, and intellectual synthesis. We as a society need to engage in more discussions about research, problem solving, ethical leadership, and knowledge creation not so much about entry level salaries. Both educational institutions and families should change their perspective of education from merely a private economic return to a public good that drives innovation and social transformation.

The digitalization of education is even more the reason why the deficiencies of the educational ecosystem become obvious. There is no way that online learning, AI, powered classrooms, and digital testing can exist without a constant supply of electricity, a cheap internet connection, and appropriate devices. These are dependent on the delivery of power, telecom, and digital public infrastructure, sectors that are hardly taken into account in the education budget discussions.

Ultimately, education results cannot be separated from employment and economic policy. Skilling programs do not make sense if industrial growth, MSME support, and labor reforms do not lead to job creation. When graduates are underemployed, the blame is usually put on institutions while economic planning that is out of alignment is ignored.

If India truly wants better learning outcomes, higher quality research, and a workforce that is prepared for the future, it should stop thinking in silos. Funding education needs to be considered as one ecological system where, for instance, governmental departments cooperate, societies become involved, and the criteria for success are diverse including health, infrastructure, innovation, and employment.

So, the main point should not be solely the volume of India's expenditure on education but also the effectiveness, consistency, and combination of its investments in all aspects which enhance the value of education.

More Articles ...