A 49-year-old college professor was found dead under suspicious circumstances inside her apartment in east Delhi's Vasundhara Enclave on Thursday, prompting police to register a murder case and launch an intensive investigation.

 

The deceased has been identified as Devosmita Paul, an Assistant Professor at Shivaji College. She lived alone in her flat at Satyam Apartments.

 

According to police, the incident came to light around 2:35 pm when a PCR call was received from the victim's sister, Devarati Paul. She informed authorities that Devosmita had been found dead inside her residence after remaining unresponsive to repeated phone calls throughout the day.

 

Police said Devarati became concerned when she could not contact her sister and noticed that the apartment was locked from the outside since morning. Suspecting something was wrong, she went to the flat and broke open the lock. Upon entering, she discovered Devosmita lying dead inside the apartment and immediately alerted the police.

 

A police team rushed to the scene and secured the area for investigation. Crime branch officials and forensic experts conducted a detailed examination of the apartment and collected evidence from the spot. The body was subsequently shifted to Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital for a post-mortem examination, which is expected to provide crucial details regarding the cause and time of death.

 

Investigators suspect foul play, and a case of murder has been registered under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Police have formed multiple teams to identify and apprehend those responsible for the crime.

 

Officials are examining all possible angles, including personal and professional connections, and are reviewing evidence collected from the scene. Further details are expected to emerge as the investigation progresses.

 

The shocking incident has sent ripples through academic circles and the local community, with colleagues and residents expressing grief and concern over the tragic death of the professor.

 

Every year, millions of people light a cigarette believing it offers a moment of relaxation, relief or pleasure. Yet hidden behind that brief ritual is one of the most efficient disease-delivery systems ever created.

A cigarette may appear harmless—a small roll of tobacco wrapped in paper—but science tells a very different story. According to public health experts, each cigarette contains more than 5,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and at least 70 known carcinogens capable of causing cancer.

The danger begins with the very first puff.

Within seconds, nicotine reaches the brain and triggers the release of dopamine, the chemical associated with pleasure and reward. The smoker experiences a temporary sense of calm or satisfaction. But that feeling is short-lived. As nicotine levels drop, cravings emerge, creating a cycle of dependence that can last for decades.

"Many smokers believe cigarettes help them cope with stress," explains Dr. Amit Dias, Assistant Professor in the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine at GMC. "In reality, smoking often relieves the withdrawal symptoms caused by nicotine addiction itself."

Beyond nicotine lies a cocktail of harmful substances. Tar accumulates in the lungs, carbon monoxide deprives tissues of oxygen, formaldehyde damages cells, while arsenic, benzene, cadmium and hydrogen cyanide silently attack multiple organs. Over time, these chemicals trigger chronic inflammation, DNA damage, impaired immunity and irreversible tissue destruction.

The health consequences are devastating.

Smoking is linked to nearly 90 percent of lung cancer cases and significantly increases the risk of cancers affecting the mouth, throat, pancreas, bladder, kidney, stomach and cervix. It also remains a major contributor to heart attacks, strokes and peripheral arterial disease by damaging blood vessels and accelerating the build-up of arterial plaque.

The respiratory system bears some of the earliest scars. Chronic smokers often develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema and chronic bronchitis, conditions that gradually rob individuals of their ability to breathe comfortably.

The damage extends beyond smokers themselves.

Second-hand smoke exposes family members, co-workers and children to the same toxic chemicals. Children living in smoking households face higher risks of asthma, respiratory infections and ear diseases, despite never choosing to smoke themselves. Public health experts stress that there is no safe level of exposure to second-hand smoke.

In recent years, electronic cigarettes and vaping devices have emerged as alternatives to conventional smoking. Marketed as cleaner and safer, these products have attracted millions of users, particularly young people. While vaping may expose users to fewer combustion-related toxins than traditional cigarettes, health experts caution against viewing them as harmless.

Most vaping products still contain nicotine, and their aerosols can carry heavy metals, toxic compounds and ultrafine particles. The long-term health consequences remain uncertain. More concerning is the growing popularity of flavoured products among adolescents, raising fears of a new generation becoming addicted to nicotine.

For decades, tobacco companies carefully cultivated the image of smoking as glamorous, sophisticated and rebellious. Films, advertisements and celebrity endorsements transformed cigarettes into symbols of confidence and independence. But behind the marketing lies a stark reality: tobacco addiction kills millions globally every year.

The encouraging news is that the body begins to heal almost immediately after quitting. Within 20 minutes, heart rate and blood pressure start returning to normal. Within weeks and months, circulation and lung function improve. After a year, the risk of heart disease falls significantly, while long-term cancer and stroke risks continue to decline over time.

Public health specialists emphasize that quitting is often a journey rather than a single event. Many smokers require multiple attempts before achieving lasting success, and setbacks should be viewed as part of the recovery process rather than failure.

As the world observes efforts to reduce tobacco use, the message from healthcare professionals remains clear: tobacco is not merely a personal habit—it is a public health challenge that affects families, communities and future generations. Combating it requires awareness, strong public policies, accessible cessation support and a collective commitment to replacing myths with science.

The cigarette's greatest deception is its appearance of harmlessness. In reality, every puff carries a biological cost. Understanding that truth may be the first step toward a healthier future.

Dr. Amit Dias

The Directorate of Higher Secondary Education (DHSE) has declared the Kerala Plus Two Result 2026 today at 3 PM, bringing relief to nearly 4.52 lakh students who appeared for the Class 12 examinations this year.

The Higher Secondary examinations were conducted between March 6 and March 28 across the state. Following the announcement of results, students are now awaiting the release of the Kerala Plus Two toppers list 2026, which is expected to include stream-wise and district-wise top performers from Science, Commerce and Humanities.

DHSE Kerala is also expected to publish district performance statistics and overall pass percentage data shortly.

Kerala Plus Two pass percentage trends

Kerala has witnessed a gradual decline in overall Plus Two pass percentages over the past few years:

  • 2025 — 77.81%
  • 2024 — 78.69%
  • 2023 — 82.95%
  • 2022 — 88.37%
  • 2021 — 87.94%

Last year, the Science stream recorded the highest pass percentage at 83.25%, followed by Commerce at 74.21% and Humanities at 69.16%.

Official websites to check Kerala Plus Two Result 2026

Students can access their results through the following official portals:

How to check Kerala DHSE Plus Two Result 2026

Students can follow these steps to access their scores:

  1. Visit any official DHSE Kerala result website.
  2. Click on the “DHSE Class 12 Result 2026” link.
  3. Enter registration number, roll number and date of birth.
  4. Submit the details.
  5. Download and save the scorecard for future reference.

Results available on DigiLocker and Saphalam app

Students can also download their digital marksheets through DigiLocker and the Saphalam application.

To access results through DigiLocker:

  • Open DigiLocker or visit DigiLocker
  • Log in using the Aadhaar-linked mobile number
  • Search for “DHSE Plus Two Results 2026”
  • Enter required credentials
  • Download the digital marksheet

Meanwhile, students who fail to clear one or more subjects will have another opportunity through the DHSE “Save A Year” supplementary examinations, which are expected to be conducted in June, similar to previous years.

The School and Mass Education Department has introduced a major reform in vocational education by removing stream-based restrictions for Plus II students, allowing them to freely choose subjects and trade combinations across Arts, Science and Commerce streams.

Under the new policy, vocational students will no longer be bound by the traditional division of Humanities, Science or Commerce while selecting their Basic Foundation Course (BFC) subjects. The decision has been implemented under provisions of the Orissa Higher Secondary Education Act, 1982.

The reform means students enrolled in vocational trades can now opt for any BFC subjects of their choice, irrespective of the trade they pursue, subject to availability in their respective Higher Secondary Schools.

Officials from the Council of Higher Secondary Education said the move abolishes the earlier grouping system that restricted students to stream-specific subject combinations.

Previously, vocational students studying trades such as Poultry, Horticulture, Auditing and Accounting were required to select additional BFC subjects only from Science or Commerce streams, while students in Music trade were confined to Arts-related subjects.

With the latest notification, these limitations have been removed. A vocational student can now combine subjects from Arts, Science and Commerce according to individual interest and career goals.

Education officials said the decision assumes importance ahead of admissions for the 2026–27 academic session in Higher Secondary Schools across Odisha.

The reform aligns closely with the vision of the National Education Policy 2020, which promotes multidisciplinary learning, flexibility and student-centric education pathways. The policy framework encourages institutions to move away from rigid academic silos and enable learners to pursue diverse combinations of subjects and skills.

A senior CHSE official noted that earlier restrictions were largely linked to infrastructural limitations and resource constraints in schools. However, the government concluded that such limitations should not prevent students from studying subjects aligned with their interests and future aspirations.

Education experts believe the decision could significantly improve the attractiveness of vocational education by offering students greater academic freedom and reducing the long-standing perception that vocational streams provide limited learning choices.

The reform is also expected to support interdisciplinary learning and improve employability by allowing students to combine technical trade skills with subjects from other disciplines, creating broader academic and career opportunities.

Observers say Odisha’s move reflects a wider national shift towards more flexible and skill-oriented education models aimed at preparing students for evolving workforce demands and diverse career pathways.

In an age of constant notifications, overflowing to-do lists, and endless multitasking, calendars are evolving from simple scheduling tools into powerful productivity systems. Whether digital or physical, calendars can help people structure their time, reduce stress, and improve focus in ways that go far beyond marking meetings or birthdays.

Here are some practical and creative ways to use calendars more effectively in daily life.

1. Replace Endless To-Do Lists with Time Blocking

One of the most effective productivity methods today is time blocking — assigning dedicated time slots for specific tasks instead of relying on scattered to-do lists.

Rather than writing “Finish presentation” somewhere among dozens of pending tasks, scheduling it from 9:00 AM to 10:30 AM creates accountability and mental commitment. Time blocking also reduces constant task-switching, a habit known to damage concentration and productivity.

When every important activity has a designated space on the calendar, people spend less time deciding what to do next and more time actually working.

2. Schedule Breaks and “White Space”

Many people mistakenly equate productivity with nonstop work. In reality, sustained productivity depends heavily on rest, recovery, and mental breathing room.

Adding “white space” into calendars — short breaks, buffer periods, or unscheduled time — can prevent burnout and improve long-term focus. Without breaks, calendars become overcrowded, leaving little room for unexpected tasks or mental recovery.

This matters more than ever in modern workplaces, where stress and digital fatigue continue to rise. Even small recovery periods between meetings or work sessions can improve energy and concentration throughout the day.

3. Use Color Coding to Understand Your Life Better

Color coding transforms calendars from plain schedules into visual productivity maps.

Different colors can represent different priorities:

  • Blue for focused work or projects
  • Green for health, fitness, or personal habits
  • Red for urgent deadlines
  • Yellow for social activities or family time

This visual system helps people quickly identify whether their week feels balanced or overloaded in one area. For example, a calendar dominated entirely by work-related colors may signal the need for more personal downtime.

Over time, color-coded calendars can reveal patterns people may otherwise ignore.

4. Keep a Physical Calendar Alongside Digital Tools

While smartphones and apps provide reminders and convenience, physical calendars still offer unique benefits.

Writing tasks manually often improves memory retention and creates a stronger psychological connection to goals. Many people also find satisfaction in crossing off completed activities — a small but motivating sense of accomplishment.

A physical monthly calendar also offers a broader visual overview. Looking at an entire month at once can help people anticipate busy weeks, plan ahead, and avoid scheduling overload.

Using both digital and physical systems together can combine flexibility with clarity.

5. Turn Your Calendar into a Reflection Tool

Calendars should not only help people plan the future — they can also help evaluate the past.

Spending five minutes each week reviewing completed schedules can reveal important insights:

  • Which tasks took longer than expected?
  • Where did distractions occur?
  • Which time blocks worked best?
  • What activities drained energy?

This habit transforms calendars from passive planners into active self-improvement tools. Over time, people begin understanding how they work best and can adjust routines accordingly.

Ultimately, productivity is not just about doing more. It is about using time with greater intention, balance, and clarity — and a thoughtfully used calendar can quietly become one of the most effective tools for achieving exactly that.

JD Institute of Fashion Technology has received accreditation from the Global Standardization and Accreditation Agency (GSAAA), marking a significant development in India’s evolving design and fashion education landscape.

The accreditation recognises the institute’s academic framework, curriculum structure, teaching methodologies, and institutional standards, reflecting a growing push toward global benchmarking and quality assurance within creative education.

Growing Focus On Quality Standards In Design Education

The recognition comes at a time when fashion and design education is expanding rapidly across India and other emerging markets, increasing the need for structured accreditation systems and internationally recognised academic standards.

Education experts say external accreditation is becoming increasingly important as students seek programmes that offer stronger industry relevance, global recognition, and career-oriented learning.

Through the GSAAA accreditation, JD Institute of Fashion Technology joins a broader movement among creative institutions aiming to align academic delivery with internationally accepted educational practices.

The accreditation process evaluates multiple aspects of institutional performance, including:

  • Curriculum quality
  • Faculty expertise
  • Infrastructure standards
  • Academic delivery systems
  • Student learning outcomes

For students, such recognition can improve confidence in programme quality while also strengthening the credibility of qualifications in domestic and international professional environments.

Bridging Creative Learning With Industry Expectations

A major focus of the accreditation framework is the alignment between classroom education and real-world industry demands.

Fashion and design institutions today are increasingly expected to equip students not only with creative capabilities but also with practical skills, technical proficiency, and professional readiness.

Industry observers note that the fashion sector is undergoing rapid transformation driven by:

  • Digital design technologies
  • Sustainability-focused practices
  • E-commerce integration
  • Artificial intelligence in fashion workflows
  • Evolving global consumer trends

As a result, design education institutions are under growing pressure to continuously update teaching models and ensure students remain adaptable to industry changes.

The GSAAA accreditation reflects this shift toward outcome-oriented creative education where employability, innovation, and interdisciplinary learning are becoming central priorities.

Strengthening Global Opportunities For Design Students

By securing international accreditation, JD Institute of Fashion Technology is also expected to strengthen its global academic positioning and expand opportunities for international collaboration.

Experts say globally recognised accreditation frameworks can help institutions:

  • Build stronger academic partnerships
  • Enhance student mobility opportunities
  • Improve international recognition of qualifications
  • Increase industry collaboration and exposure

For students pursuing careers in fashion, interior design, communication design, and related creative industries, such recognition may provide greater access to international learning ecosystems and evolving global design networks.

Design Education Becoming Increasingly Structured

The development also highlights a larger transformation occurring within design education itself.

Traditionally viewed as highly creative and less standardised compared to technical disciplines, fashion and design education is now increasingly adopting structured quality frameworks similar to those seen in engineering, management, and professional studies.

Institutions are placing greater emphasis on:

  • Academic accountability
  • Industry integration
  • Skill-based learning
  • Professional training
  • International benchmarking

Education analysts believe this evolution is essential as creative industries become more technology-driven, commercially competitive, and globally interconnected.

Preparing Future Designers For A Changing Industry

As the global fashion and design ecosystem continues evolving, institutions are increasingly being evaluated on their ability to prepare students for rapidly changing professional environments.

Accreditations such as GSAAA are seen as part of this broader transition toward future-ready design education models that combine creativity with innovation, technology, and industry relevance.

For aspiring designers, developments like these signal growing opportunities within structured, internationally aligned creative education systems designed to support both artistic growth and long-term career readiness.

Across the country, private schools and nonprofit organisations are running more fundraising campaigns than ever before. Annual giving drives, scholarship funds, capital campaigns, alumni outreach programmes, gala events, and end-of-year appeals now operate simultaneously across increasingly stretched development teams.

Yet despite rising donor engagement efforts, many organisations are discovering that the traditional systems managing these campaigns are no longer sustainable.

The real problem is not a lack of fundraising ambition. It is operational fragmentation.

For years, schools and nonprofits have managed campaigns through disconnected spreadsheets, scattered donor lists, email threads, and isolated volunteer committees. While these systems may have worked when organisations handled one or two campaigns annually, they are collapsing under the weight of modern fundraising demands.

The consequences are becoming harder to ignore.

Donors who contribute generously are sometimes left waiting weeks for acknowledgements because information sits across multiple systems. Development teams spend hours manually reconciling reports instead of building relationships. Campaign messaging becomes inconsistent because different teams communicate with the same donor in entirely different ways.

Most critically, leadership often lacks a complete picture of fundraising performance in real time.

This is not simply an administrative inconvenience. It is a structural weakness that directly affects donor trust, campaign effectiveness, and long-term financial sustainability.

The Hidden Cost Of Fragmented Campaigns

One of the biggest misconceptions in fundraising is that inefficiency reveals itself through dramatic breakdowns. In reality, the damage usually appears gradually.

A missed follow-up call. An outdated donor spreadsheet. Duplicate outreach from two different campaign teams. Delayed reporting. Inconsistent donor communication.

Individually, these issues may seem minor. Collectively, they create friction that weakens relationships and erodes confidence.

In mission-driven organisations where fundraising depends heavily on trust and long-term engagement, these small operational failures accumulate into major strategic problems.

What makes the situation more concerning is that many nonprofits and schools continue trying to solve fundamentally structural issues with temporary fixes. More spreadsheets are added. Additional tools are introduced. New volunteers are assigned. But the underlying fragmentation remains untouched.

Eventually, growth itself exposes the system’s limitations.

A fundraising structure designed for two annual campaigns cannot effectively manage five or six simultaneous initiatives targeting overlapping donor communities.

Why Centralised Fundraising Matters

Increasingly, schools and nonprofits are recognising that the solution is not merely “better fundraising software.” The real shift is toward centralised fundraising operations.

At its core, centralisation means treating fundraising as a unified organisational strategy rather than a collection of disconnected campaigns.

This involves consolidating donor data, communication histories, campaign timelines, reporting systems, and operational workflows into a shared framework visible across the entire development function.

The value of this approach extends far beyond efficiency.

When donor interactions are centralised, organisations gain the ability to understand relationships holistically. A parent contributing to a scholarship fund is no longer viewed separately from the same individual donating to an annual campaign or attending a fundraising gala.

That continuity fundamentally changes the donor experience.

Instead of fragmented interactions, communication becomes thoughtful, coordinated, and personalised. Donors feel recognised rather than processed.

And in fundraising, trust often matters more than outreach volume.

The Operational Shift Many Organisations Avoid

Centralisation, however, requires more than purchasing a platform or migrating data.

The most successful organisations redesign workflows alongside technology. They standardise how campaigns are created, how donor information is recorded, how progress is measured, and how teams coordinate internally.

This process-driven transformation is where many institutions hesitate.

Operational restructuring demands discipline, internal alignment, and a willingness to challenge legacy habits that evolved informally over years. Yet avoiding this shift only prolongs inefficiency.

The reality is that fundraising today is no longer just about asking for donations. It is about managing relationships at scale while maintaining consistency, transparency, and strategic clarity.

That cannot be achieved through disconnected systems.

Why Schools Face An Even Greater Challenge

Private schools, in particular, sit at the centre of this operational dilemma.

Most institutions simultaneously manage annual funds, endowment campaigns, alumni engagement, scholarship drives, infrastructure fundraising, and event-based initiatives — often targeting the same parent and alumni communities.

Without centralisation, these efforts can easily overlap or compete with one another.

A donor approached aggressively by multiple teams without coordinated communication may not perceive institutional enthusiasm. They may perceive organisational confusion.

At the same time, development staff frequently lose valuable hours to administrative maintenance rather than meaningful relationship-building.

For institutions already operating with limited staffing capacity, this inefficiency becomes financially unsustainable.

The Future Of Fundraising Is Structural, Not Transactional

Perhaps the most important lesson emerging from organisations adopting centralised models is that sustainable fundraising depends less on campaign volume and more on operational coherence.

The strongest fundraising programmes are not necessarily those running the most campaigns. They are the ones creating the clearest systems around donor engagement, communication, reporting, and long-term relationship management.

This represents a larger shift in how nonprofits and educational institutions must think about fundraising itself.

The future will belong not to organisations with the loudest outreach, but to those capable of building connected, intelligent systems that support both staff efficiency and donor trust simultaneously.

In that sense, centralised fundraising is not simply a technological trend. It is becoming an organisational necessity.

And for schools and nonprofits navigating increasingly complex fundraising environments, the question may no longer be whether centralisation is needed — but how long they can afford to delay it.

More Articles ...