Indian Grassroots Talent Needs Scholarships — Not Sympathy, but a System

Editorial
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

On a humid afternoon in a small Bihar town, a first-generation college aspirant stands outside a bank clutching a thin folder of certificates. He has earned his place at a reputable private university in Kolkata. What he hasn’t earned—because no exam allows him to—is the shortfall of ₹42,000 in first-semester fees. His merit has opened the gate; his economic reality may still shut it.

Multiply that tension across millions of Indian households and you begin to understand the quiet crisis building beneath the promise of higher education. Scholarships in India are not an optional add-on. They are now the difference between a system that expands and a generation quietly pushed back into the margins.

Under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, India has set an ambitious goal: lift its Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) from 28.4% to 50% by 2035. That means bringing more than 60% additional students into colleges and universities—and ensuring they stay long enough to graduate. Without a predictable, transparent, and timely scholarship ecosystem, that target becomes less policy vision and more political slogan.

This is a story of why India must treat scholarships as national infrastructure, how the current system actually works on the ground, and what universities must urgently rethink if we truly want grassroots talent to walk confidently into the future.

From Kindness to Statecraft: How India Must Rethink Scholarships

For decades, scholarships were rooted in charity—philanthropists, donors, or the occasional empathetic administrator stepping in to support “poor but deserving” students. That world is gone.

Post-pandemic India is navigating job losses, inflation, rising cost of living, and the steep expense of running modern university campuses—labs, hostels, digital platforms, research facilities. Families that could once stretch to accommodate fees can no longer do so. Many students secure admission but cannot afford to join; others join but drop out mid-semester because money simply doesn’t arrive on time.

For universities, this is not a footnote. A dropout means:

  • lost future revenue

  • damaged placement and alumni outcomes

  • a reputation in local communities that says, “These campuses are not meant for families like yours.”

Institutions across the Global South have begun adopting the idea of “empathetic universities.” Financial aid is not a welfare activity—it is a strategic investment in retention, completion, and institutional credibility. Every fee waiver or emergency grant is not a cost but a protection of long-term institutional health.

If India is serious about democratising higher education, scholarships must move from a side-desk in a dusty admin corridor to the centre of institutional planning.

Who Actually Pays for Scholarships? The Multi-Wallet Map

Every scholarship letter hides multiple layers of funding—from governments, universities, corporates, communities, and alumni.

1. The Government Bedrock

The National Scholarship Portal (NSP) has consolidated major central schemes:

  • Central Sector Scheme (CSSS/PM-USP): ₹12,000–₹20,000 annually for meritorious low-income students.

  • Post-matric support for SC/ST/OBC students: tuition, stipends, non-refundable fees.

  • Top Class Education schemes: full coverage for high-performing marginalised students.

Institutes like IITs add their own equity measures:

  • 100% fee waiver for income below ₹1 lakh

  • 2/3rd waiver for ₹1–5 lakh

  • Interest-free loans for remaining dues

This ensures a landless farmer’s child sits in the same classroom as a CEO’s.

2. States Add Their Own Layers

Odisha, the North-East, Himachal, and Telangana run targeted schemes—small amounts, but often the difference between staying enrolled and dropping out.

The real challenge is not absence of schemes, but lack of navigation. Students rarely know what they’re eligible for without institutional guidance.

3. Inside the Campus: Public vs Private Institutions

Public institutions rely on fee waivers and government support.
Private universities—especially not-for-profit ones—now run detailed need-based assessments, sometimes covering:

  • 25%–100% tuition

  • hostel + mess

  • even small living stipends

This is quietly redrawing the old map where “private” meant “elitist.”

4. Corporate, Community and Philanthropic Funds

India’s CSR law, mandating 2% profit spending, has birthed:

  • STEM scholarships for girls

  • scholarships for aspirational districts

  • disability-inclusive schemes

  • community and faith-based bursaries

Often these act as crucial top-ups to bridge the last mile.

The New Categories of Scholarships: Beyond Merit vs Means

Indian scholarships now fall into a broader spectrum:

  1. Pure Merit – attracts toppers; boosts institutional brand.

  2. Need-Based / Merit-Cum-Means – the most effective for mobility.

  3. Social Justice & Identity-Based – supporting SC, ST, OBC, minorities, PwD, EWS.

  4. Gender, Region, Talent Focused – girl-child, musicians, athletes, North-East students, Ladakh scholars.

  5. Crisis & Completion Grants – for medical emergencies, lost income, last-semester dues.

  6. Digital Access Support – devices, data for blended learning.

These emerging forms acknowledge the hidden costs of studying—travel, nutrition, devices, rent—which often determine success more than tuition.

Cracks in the System: Delays, Leakages, and a Trust Deficit

Students consistently face:

  • delayed fund disbursals

  • unclear income documentation rules

  • inconsistent scheme combinations

  • poor coordination between colleges, banks, and district offices

Worse, investigative reports in several states show ghost beneficiaries, siphoned funds, and forged lists.

Every delay deepens mistrust. Every scam pushes a vulnerable student closer to dropout.

What Universities Must Do—Now

The good news: universities do not need to wait for national reform. They can act today.

1. Make Scholarships Core Strategy

  • Integrate financial aid with admissions and outreach.

  • Track effects on retention, not just count of scholarships distributed.

2. Build a Diversified Funding Base

Blend:

  • government schemes

  • CSR partnerships

  • alumni giving

  • community trusts

and publish transparent impact reports.

3. Create a One-Stop “Scholarship Navigation Desk”

An institutional NSP helpdesk can:

  • guide families through applications

  • map all eligible schemes for each student

  • help secure loans only as a last resort

For first-generation learners, this support is transformative.

4. Use Tech with Empathy

  • WhatsApp reminders

  • multilingual chatbots

  • digital grievance tracking

Let automation free staff for human problems.

5. Protect Emergency & Completion Funds

A ₹10,000 grant at the right moment can prevent a dropout.
Universities must institutionalise such quick-response funds.

A Scholarship is a Social Contract

A scholarship letter is not merely a financial document. It is an assertion of belonging.

When a Dalit girl from eastern Uttar Pradesh receives a Top Class scholarship, a central grant, and a full waiver, it tells her:
“Your place in this classroom is not conditional.”

When a private university writes to a rickshaw-puller’s son saying, “Your fees are waived—come study,” it rewrites generational narratives about who “belongs” in higher education.

When a state quietly reforms its portals and ensures timely payment, it builds bridges across centuries of exclusion.

If India truly wants to become a $10-trillion knowledge economy, it cannot leave half its young talent standing outside campus gates, admission letter in hand, waiting for a bank draft that never comes.

For every vice-chancellor, trustee and policymaker, the question is now stark:

Will scholarships in your institution remain a marketing tagline—or become the empathetic engine that powers India’s mobility, merit and modernity?

For that young student in Bihar—and millions like him—the answer determines whether higher education becomes a staircase of opportunity or another locked door.

The author is the Chief Mentor of Edinbox and works as a Director with the Techno India group of Kolkata, along with being the Principal Adviser of the Kolkata based university of the group.