Global Education News | Stay Informed with Edinbox

Several students who have come back from Iran told that the conditions there are normal and not as serious as it is being shown on social media. They emphasized that they did not see any protests and they were completely safe during their stay there.

Students mainly from medical and professional courses in Iran told the journalists that they learned about the protests through news and social media but the daily life in the cities where they lived was continuing without any disturbances. On the other hand, they said that the internet was not working, and there was no presence of fear either on the campuses or in the surrounding areas.

Several students stated that a large number of their classmates and fellow Indian students preferred to stay back in Iran and did not opt for

return, as academic activities were continuing normally. “We only heard about protests but never saw anything with our own eyes,” some of the returned students said, adding that social media narratives appeared exaggerated and misleading.

Parents of the returning students expressed relief over the safe arrival of their children and extended gratitude to the All-India Medical Students Association for its coordination and support during the process. They particularly thanked Dr Mohammad Moomin Khan, Vice President of AIMSA, for what they described as tireless efforts to ensure the students’ safe return.

“We are really thankful to AIMSA, especially Dr Mohammad Moomin Khan, who made every possible effort so that our children could return home safely,” parents said.

The students maintained that there was no panic on the ground in Iran and urged people to rely on verified information rather than unconfirmed social media content, which they said often amplifies fear without reflecting reality.

The Indian government will roll out a new PM Research Chair scheme to attract 120 global Indian scientists and researchers back to the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) over the next five years. Discussed during an IIT council meeting, this move aims to enhance the country's higher education and research ecosystem by involving top Indian-origin talent in the major sectors.

Objectives of the PM Research Chair Scheme

The PM Research Chair scheme has conferred on the research fellows the liberty to select their own research topic out of 14 themes of national importance. The Chair post holders will be Research fellows, Senior Research Fellows and Research Chairs. This will be a follow, up to the existing scheme of research chairs and will expand the scope of activities that research chairs can do. A Department of Education spokesman further revealed that the scheme is targeted at strengthening the research capacity of institutions, stimulating innovation, and thus, raising India's position on the world map in science and technology by the ministry of education.

Strategic Importance

The IIT Council, which is the highest coordinating body for the IITs, was informed about the proposal at its meeting held in August last year. It is seen as a strategic move to tap the global talent pool of Indian origin and to solve problems in India's higher education system like a limited number of specialisations and lack of internship opportunities. The Council believes that this scheme will attract top researchers and thus improve the research environment in IITs.

Supporting Measures and Recommendations

Besides the PM Research Chair initiative, the IIT Council has also suggested that a comprehensive survey be undertaken in all the 23 IITs to evaluate the alumni outcomes and the socioeconomic impact of the graduates from the 2013, 2014, and 2015 batches. Along with the survey, which will investigate the primary reasons for IIT graduates to study abroad, the Council has also proposed reforms in the MTech and PhD programmes such as increasing the number of industry internships and making specialisation more accessible. The implementation of these recommendations will be under the aegis of IIT Bombay.

Earlier, the Council discussed the necessity of updating MTech and PhD programmes to meet the requirements of the industry more closely. Internships are to be made a compulsory part of the MTech curriculum, which is one of the important changes that could increase the student intake in these programmes, as per the Council's suggestion.

Looking Ahead

The Prime Minister Research Visit, IIT Council has expressed its confidence that the scheme can bring significant changes in research capabilities of India. Along with the reforms that have been proposed, this initiative is a crucial step towards the betterment of the academic and research environment in India.

For decades, India’s higher education narrative has been dominated by a single aspiration: going abroad. From middle-class families stretching finances for overseas tuition to record-breaking visa numbers each year, studying overseas has become both a dream and a perceived necessity. Nevertheless, a contemporary NITI Aayog report on the globalisation of higher education, puts forward a challenging question: given India is one of the largest exporters of students in the world, why does it attract so few students from abroad?

Back in 2021, while only one international student was studying in India, 24 Indian students went abroad for higher studies. This disparity becomes even more glaring in the light of the government's very ambitious aim of accommodating 1.1 million international students by 2047, a target that seems very far away in the light of the present situation.

A Global Supplier of Students

India has firmly established itself as the world's top source country for students studying abroad. In the past ten years, more and more people have been going overseas, and the most favorite places to study were the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. After the pandemic, an enormous surge of outbound students was witnessed mainly due to the previous admissions of students and students waiting to be admitted to the next semester.

Most notably, the increase in numbers of students going out to study in 2020 and 2021from around 680, 000 to 1.15 million does not indicate a sudden physical move. This is, rather, a combination of enrolments, including those who started their courses online or delayed their travel due to Covid, 19 restrictions.

Whatever these technicalities may be, the fundamental trend is quite apparent: India's student mobility continues to be largely single, directional.

The Inbound Blind Spot

While concerns about “brain drain” dominate public discourse, inbound mobility to India has barely grown. For most of the past decade, international student enrolment has hovered around 45,000 to 50,000 annually—a marginal figure for a country of India’s size and academic history.

Despite its English-language advantage and vast institutional network, India attracts less than 1% of the world’s globally mobile students. This stands in stark contrast to countries that actively treat international education as a strategic economic and diplomatic sector.

Education as a Migration Pathway

The NITI Aayog report also highlights a shift in Indian students' choosing of destinations. More and more, education is regarded as a migration, related investment, and not merely a scholastic pursuit. Countries such as Canada and Australia are top of the list because the degree programmes there are combined with the rights of post, study work, the options of residency, and access to the labour market.

India, on the other hand, has not positioned its own education system within a similar global framework of opportunity.

The Economic Cost of a One-Way Flow

International students are not just cultural ambassadors—they are major economic contributors. In top destination countries, they generate billions through tuition, housing, local spending and long-term workforce participation.

India’s inability to attract foreign students at scale leads to:

• Lost foreign exchange inflows

• Reduced campus diversity

• Weaker global university rankings

• Limited research and academic cross-pollination

At the same time, the continuous outflow of Indian students represents a massive financial transfer abroad, deepening the asymmetry.

Why India Struggles as a Global Education Hub

The report identifies several structural barriers:

• A limited number of globally ranked institutions

• Curricula misaligned with international credit systems

• Complex regulatory and visa processes

• Weak global branding of Indian universities

• Inadequate student support ecosystems

Most critically, internationalisation has not been treated as a system-wide priority, but as a peripheral ambition.

A Strategic Choice Ahead

Instead of blaming the imbalance as a mistake, the report rather sees it as an opening. Along with reforms under the National Education Policy, the establishment of foreign university campuses, and renewed global engagement, India could present itself as a serious education destination.

However, the facts are unambiguous: if there is no deep change in structure, India will continue to be what it is already a country sending students to others, but not a country attracting students for education.

At a time when the movement of talent is the main factor of a nation's competitiveness, this imbalance may be more expensive than it looks.

India wants to host more than one million international students by 2047.The new government-sponsored report presents the long-term view of how higher education is positioned as a key element of India's plan for future growth and development. While the projected and projected figures are encouraging, the report also shows that in order for India to be able to compete effectively with established global educational hubs, there are numerous serious structural deficiencies that must be overcome.

Titled "Internationalisation of Higher Education in India: Prospects, Potential and Policy Recommendations", the report was produced by NITI Aayog in cooperation with IIT Madras and the Association of Indian Universities. In addition to viewing international education as a source of income for the country, the report also views it as a means of soft power, a multiplier for research, and a method of redrawing India's position as a knowledge economy.

With more than 1,200 universities and close to 40 million students, India now has the second-largest higher education system in the world. Furthermore, according to many experts, the median age of the Indian population is slightly over 28 years, which is one of the youngest in the world. In spite of this, India's presence in the international student market has historically been quite small. Thus, in 2021-22, approximately 50,000 foreign students enrolled in Indian universities, whereas nearly 1.1 million Indians were studying in foreign countries.

This asymmetry lies at the heart of the challenge.

Globally, countries such as the US, UK, Australia, Germany, and Canada treat international education as a strategic export. India, the report suggests, has largely functioned as a talent supplier rather than a destination. By 2022, Indian families were estimated to have spent nearly $47 billion on overseas education—a figure that is expected to rise if current trends continue.

The motivations are not hard to understand. Students seek stronger research ecosystems, global exposure, industry-aligned curricula, and smoother pathways to international careers. While India’s elite institutions enjoy global reputations, the broader university system struggles with uneven quality, limited international faculty, outdated syllabi, and weak global linkages.

The report projects that with sustained reforms, inbound international enrolment could reach 85,000–1.5 lakh by 2030, 3.6 lakh by 2035, and potentially between 3 lakh and 11 lakh by 2047. Achieving even the lower end of this range would mark a significant shift—from a country known for exporting students to one that attracts them.

But the authors are clear: this will not happen organically.

According to the authors, the national Internationalization Strategy should focus on establishing Joint Degree Programs, supporting the mobility of International Faculty, creating Globally Benchmarked Curricula, and developing Research Partnerships. One of their most progressive proposals is to establish Regional Higher Education Hubs, much like those found in Singapore, the UAE, and other areas of Europe, which would serve as a destination for international campuses, conferences, and collaborative research centers.

The report highlighted that India is lacking in the area of research. Despite the large number of publications coming from India, the majority are cited from a very small number of prestigious institutions, limiting India's global collaboration potential. Without developing a stronger research ecosystem, it will be difficult for India to gain access to Doctoral Students, Global Faculty and Innovation-Driven Investments.

Throughout the document, the authors made reference to India's ancient centres of learning such as Nalanda, Takshashila, and Vikramshila, serving as a reminder that global education has a long history in the Indian subcontinent. What is new is the scale of competition.

By 2047, India faces a choice: remain a net exporter of talent or rebuild universities that draw the world in. The ambition is bold. Whether the system can reform fast enough to match it remains an open question.

An expert clarifies the reasons for a large number of Indian students who are looking to study abroad in 2026, the first four countries that come to their mind are the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. However, New Zealand keeps receiving good number of applications from outside that group. Its attractiveness is not based on the large number of people or on something grand. It is based on the fact that it is a predictable, well, organized and outcome, oriented country. "In terms of work, life balance, New Zealand is ranked number one in the world, " said Piyush Kumar, Regional Director for South Asia, Canada and Latin America at IDP Education. "It is a small country with only 8 universities, but all of them are in the top 2% universities in the world according to the QS rankings, " he added. This framework determines how students feel about the system. Since there are only 8 public universities, the range of choice is limited but more obvious. Students are not confronted with a large number of institutions which have poor outcomes. Instead, the system ensures that preferences made on different campuses are consistent in terms of academic standards as well as student support.

Who New Zealand suits best New Zealand is a suitable destination for students who prefer a manageable approach rather than a large, scale one. The country does not have as many institutions or programmes as bigger destinations. What it does have is a lot more straightforward. It is easier to figure out from the very beginning the access requirements, the academic expectations, and the options after the study. Kumar highlights lifestyle as the main factor for retention. Great work, life balance, he said, naming one of the most commonly cited reasons for the choice of the country by students. For Indian students, especially those doing postgraduate studies, this balance usually means less burnout and a more stable routine during the study. Courses driving Indian interest Choice of programmes among Indian students is mainly based on the practicality of the subject. Kumar says, to name a few, top areas of student interest are information technology, environmental sciences, business programmes, and hospitality. These areas not only match with New Zealand's domestic skills needs but also in the sectors where students can do part time jobs during their studies. Environmental sciences become a significant pull factor for the students as a new area. As issues like climate change, sustainability, and resource management are becoming more and more important worldwide, New Zealand's academic focus in these areas is getting students who are looking beyond the usual business or technology tracks.

Policy stability or stability in immigration law and policy plays a central role in New Zealand continued appeal.

New Zealand offers three years of post study work rights, a factor that strongly shapes student decisions.

That is the thing because, for many Indian families, post study work is not an optional benefit. It is part of the return, on, investment calculation.

Just as important is the absence of constant bouncing back of policy. While other destinations have changed student visa rules, dependent eligibility, or work conditions in short cycles, New Zealands framework has remained comparatively steady. This lowers the risk of planning over two or three years of an academic journey.

Safety is another element that retains the interest of the public. New Zealand ranks highly on personal safety indicators, and its smaller cities often are less overwhelming for first, time international students. For parents who are deciding on the destination while staying at home, this predictability matters.

Merged with structured arrival and orientation systems at universities, the overall environment seems to be designed rather than done by chance. For students who are moving abroad for the first time, that difference is noticeable.

An option that stays under the radar New Zealands study, abroad appeal is not the result of loud marketing or high figures. It stays very much under the radar, and perhaps that is the reason why it is so often called an underrated destination. However, the country remains to be on the 2026 map for those students who, among other things, value a balanced lifestyle, straightforward post, study pathways, and institutional consistency.

As per Kumars evaluation, New Zealand is not changing its strategy to fit everyones needs. It is providing a single, clear proposition. For some Indian students, this clarity is exactly the point.

After assurance from the college authorities regarding the pending stipends, foreign medical graduates (FMGs) at the ESIC Medical College and Hospital in Bihta, Bihar, ended their indefinite strike. The strike, which began on Tuesday morning, involved 96 interns who are doing their compulsory MBBS internship at the institute.

Most of the protesting interns have completed their medical degrees from countries like Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Nepal, Bangladesh, China, Armenia, and Ukraine. After they became members of the college on June 15, they have not been given their monthly stipments despite the administration's repeated assurance. The communication from the office of the President said the interns are to be paid 20, 000 per month, which is to be changed to 27, 000 from September 2025. The protest resulted in the suspension of outpatient department (OPD) services and other hospital activities and was only the second such demonstration in two months over the nonpayment of stipends. During the agitation, the interns said they were very angry because the administration had only issued notices but no explanation had been given for the delay.

Dr. Binay Kumar Biswas, Dean of ESIC Medical College, in a notice dated December 30, communicated that the delayed stipends would be credited "by mid, January 2026 at the earliest and by mid, February 2026 at the latest." The notice delineated the process of sanctioning the funds but did not pinpoint any reasons for the delay. "The ESIC, HQ has given the most clear, cut and detailed communication to the status of sanction and institute authority, summing up the earliest possible credit date as mid, Jan 2026 and latest by mid Feb 2026. Reasons behind and steps involved have been explained, " the notice quoted, leaving some interns still not satisfied with the explanation of the delay. After the dean's intervention on Wednesday, the interns were summoned to the conference hall. There they were informed that their internship period might be extended if they continued their strike. They were also warned not to disrupt hospital services again, as police action might be taken if they continued to agitate. After negotiations with the administration and heads of various departments, the FMG interns decided to call off their strike and return to work.

Since passing their licensing exams in January 2025, these foreign, trained doctors have been undergoing the mandatory one, year internship to practice in India. The resolution to the issue provided relief to hospital operations right away, but the frequent delays in the payment of stipends for FMG interns indicate that there are still systemic administrative issues in the management of FMG internships. Biswas was unavailable when we tried to reach out to him for his comments. The resolution, in essence, underlines the delicate balance that exists between the management of the hospital and the rights of interns, particularly those medical graduates who have come from abroad and are, on the one hand, benefitting the healthcare system of India and, on the other, facing uncertainties in regulations and finance.